2-3-4 Challenge Book Discussions #1 discussion

Did you believe Jarvis when he said he didn't have Gabrielle killed?

Oddly enough, yes. He wouldn't consider it necessary to lie since he could confess outright and still feel very confident that nothing could be done about it.

I did, too. Even though Hero stated she couldn't tell when he was lying, I think she'd have a gut instinct.

I have a hard time believing anything Jarvis says, and I can't get a feel for how much Hero knows about details in her dad's life. I would surely hope he wouldn't kill her very good friend, but expediency and perpetuation of the monarchy were what seem to have driven him more than any familial cares.

Ironically, I don't think Jarvis would ever lie to Hero. He admires and respects her too much.

Charlene wrote: "I would surely hope he wouldn't kill her very good friend, but expediency and perpetuation of the monarchy were what seem to have driven him more than any familial cares. "

Oh, I have absolutely no doubt that Jarvis would have killed her if it has been necessary.

I did too..especially when Hero believed it too. Hero and Jarvis know each other so well.

Hero and Jarivs have a very interesting dynamic for a father/daughter and especially considering the time period. They seem to have a mutual respect but also an awareness of each others true natures.

So true, Lauren.

Yes. I don't see him wasting the time or energy to have someone killed for such a small reason. But isn't it interesting that so far all the people who have caused him problems seem to get murdered by someone else's hand?

Interesting observation, Joanna.

Maybe he really IS pulling the strings in the background, lol. Just kidding.