Sci-fi and Heroic Fantasy discussion

This topic is about
Shadow & Claw
Book Discussions
>
Shadow & Claw by Gene Wolfe
date
newest »


I found it interesting that both this series, and Jack Vance's Dying Earth series take place at the end of the Sun's life, so two very different (though both equally weird) versions of what the end will be like. I enjoyed how this one made references to the past, talking about how we went to the stars but seem to have forgotten how. But there's still some leftover tech, new lifeforms (whether alien/genetically engineered/naturally evolved), etc
So far the story wanders randomly. I get the feeling that our torturer protagonist has some grand destiny (what with him acquiring the sword and the Claw) and his occasional encounters with god-like beings (I kept thinking Lovecraft here, kind of alien gods) but so far he doesn't know what he's supposed to do, so he just wanders along running into trouble, and occasionally putting on a play (had to skim that chapter, hope there wasn't something important in it). It's a book where I'm pretty well confused as to what's going on but sort of satisfied to be along for the bizarre ride just to see what pops out at the next corner.
After all, I joined this group to be exposed to new things and this is definitely different. In fact the only thing I could compare it to in style is Vance's Dying Earth, which I also read only by being part of this group. So I really need to finish both series now.

It's very worth the extra effort. I would say reading this book made me a better reader, giving me the tools to read a book where the story is not actually the words that are printed on the page. It's helped me to understand and appreciate other novels that deploy similar tricks, such as Too Like the Lightning.

I found absolutely everyone else to be unpleasant though, ugh

Keep in mind that Severian's recounting all of these incidents from his own perspective, so he frames things in such a way as to make himself look good.

On the one hand I find it refreshing because it's unlike anything else I'm reading. The world is fascinating, and I wasn't expecting to be reading about a torturer. I find Severian to be naive and full of himself, and I'm sure if I met him I probably wouldn't like him.
On the other hand, I really have to work to understand what's going on in the story. Sometimes I feel like maybe I'm just not smart enough or mature enough to be reading this. Sometimes I feel like I'm reading someone's psychedelic dream.
Here are just a *few* of the things that made me scratch my head:
(view spoiler)
I think if someone can just tell me that it will all make sense by the time I get through this, I will feel a little better. Right now, I haven't entirely made up my mind about how this book is making me feel.
Haha, I hope I don't sound frustrated. I am super happy I joined this group because I never would have picked up a book like this before. I would have been confined to my box--which is fine, but doesn't help me grow much as a reader.

Missing the point but you rated it four stars? Now I am curious :)
I totally missed the point this time. Sigh.

I like the fact you mentioned Dying Earth since it also reminded me of that book/world. I did enjoy DE more than this one - the short stories there are easier for me to follow.
Post-civilization fantasy is definitely not my thing - this book just cemented my opinion about it.
Maybe there is a purpose to it but everytime Severian encountered something (especially after he found the Claw) I was getting more and more confused. It might not be random but it felt random.
The treatment on female characters here also reminded me of Dying Earth. Why of course it is easy for them to fall into the MC's arms. And of course the MC loved them all even though he seemed to confuse love and lust and his true love changed every chapter. I guess it was a trend back then. I felt really uncomfortable reading some of the passages and almost yelled in frustration when the words melons or some fruits was used to describe one character's breasts. Ugh. I just...can't sympathize with him as a character and his plot.
Robot guy is kind of intriguing but the story never really picked up for me after 30%. I was just trying really hard to finish this. Definitely not my kind of book. No regrets though, now I can say I read it ;p

(view spoiler) I found it both amusing and rather smug. Not a pleasant dude to hang around with.

On the one hand I find it refreshing because it's unlik..."
Yep I totally get your frustration. This book really humbled me yet at the same time I also do not care that I gave it one star. Since, well, it was just not a good reading experience subjectively.
On the spoiler parts, what I could answer is:
(view spoiler)

But I agree with the person who described this as a psychedelic dream. I keep wondering if the things that happen are important (like did he survive the flower battle because he's somehow special, touched by the gods or whatnot) or is it just totally random and had nothing to do with the overall storyline.
Maybe someone who has read the full series can just drop a hint that things actually do get explained or not, then people can decide if they want to keep reading. I'll definitely continue because I happen to own an omnibus of four of the books and no point stopping halfway through if I already own the others.
Anyone understand how that bizarre botanical gardens worked? Couldn't figure out it if was a show, or time travel, or a hologram or some alien construct that does loopy things with the human mind. Who were those people he ran into, some of which could see the visitors and others could not? That whole jungle section seemed pointless, and I couldn't imagine letting people wander about with predatory animals prowling and the risk that people might get lost there forever. Not that anyone seems to put much value on human life, so perhaps it was a survival of the fittest test.

Hmm, seems like a big red flag to me. Now every time I read a character in any book saying they have a great memory my immediate thought is "the hell you do."
Shadow & Claw is not a standalone book. It makes no sense at all without Sword & Citadel. The Claw, and some of the random-seeming scenes, gain a lot more context in Citadel. "Touched by gods" is not quite the answer, it isn't that sort of fantasy story.
If I recall, the "how" of the gardens is explained. I don't remember if "why" is explained.

I found that the details I thought so important on the first read-through, that is, Severian's story and his quest, are really only the shallow surface of the story of the Book of the New Sun. However, the only way to understand the real story of Urth on a second read-through, IS to understand Severian's experience the first time through.
Just as Severian sets to write his story roughly at the end of Book 4, the entire story is strangely cyclical, and warrants a second read.
My impression is that Severian is entirely naive to the forces at play as he bumbles his way out of Nessus, and still only has a fragmented understanding of the role he plays by the end. However, through examination of what is said by those he dismisses as sidetracking him from his quest - Rudesind the art restorer, or the Androgyne in the House Absolute - you can get a better feel for the layers in mythology and storytelling.
A quick spoiler regarding regarding details from Claw of the Conciliator, and events from Sword & Citadel: (view spoiler)
And a quick spoiler/discussion regarding the structure of Shadow & Claw only: (view spoiler)
The consistency of the lore is just amazing, though. The subtle reference in Claw of the Conciliator to Urth of the New Sun, wherein (view spoiler) left me giddy, and wanting answers.
That's as far as I got with that bit of understanding, and I'll have to re-read Sword & Citadel, and maybe the whole damned thing again, to make sense of it.

How right you are. I'm told Gene Wolfe has a tendency to make great use of the "unreliable narrator" method of storytelling, and I wholly believe Severian to be that. On a second read-through, I am getting the sense that as events unfold, or even after, when Severian sets down to write his story, he still does not wholly comprehend the significance of the events he has taken in. Do not look to his account to make sense of meaning, but rather, look more at what everyone else is seemingly trying to tell him.
As for the play, it is indeed a doozy. I found it helpful to scrawl a few notes as I read it, trying to match the characters in the book with the characters in they portray on stage. There is a lot of symbolism, and I am far from being able to make sense of it, but I feel there is a lot there.


There is something about the series that draws you in, sticks with you, haunts you, and nags at you until you read it again and again. But after having read it 3 times, I would say that, from where I sit at least, things do not really get "explained" in the usual sense.
I've read a lot of commentary on this series, trying to find such an explanation. There are some critics who claim to "understand" the series, but always seem unable to articulate any kind of concrete explanation to the uninitiated.
There are others who seem to maintain that explaining everything is not the point. That the story is, like you said, a psychedelic dream. I tend to fall on that side.
Although I do get more out of it each time I read it (including more appreciation), I mainly get more puzzlement, more details that complicate it, and more questions that seem to need explanation.
If you consider the book itself as a reflection of the House Absolute, then (view spoiler) will add to your overall understanding of the book.

Well said, Dylan. I didn't love the books the first time I read them - I generally dislike fantasy, and the setting rubbed me the wrong way. I found Severian rather unlikable, and things like the Alzabo and the Averns interesting, but not willing to fit into a neat little box that I can suspend minimal disbelief to buy into.
And then months passed, and without word of exaggeration, not a day went by when I did not think back to the books in some way or another. Both little details, like the art Rudesind is cleaning when Severian first meets him, and the depth of the storytelling, such as Severian speaking of Master Gurloes being a complex man's interpretation of a simple man, had implanted deep in my mind.
I still think of this line, with some regularity: "He used to mispronounce quite common words: urticate, salpinx, bordereau."

Until the time Severian sets off on his journey, he describes their relationship as (view spoiler) . I don't recall whether he specifically denies anything having had happened, but I did not get the sense there was anything left unsaid. However, after the duel, I believe, when Severian recounts things differently,(view spoiler) .
Given Severian's perfect memory, I can come up with 3 possible explanations.
1. Severian's memory is not as perfect as he claims it to be.
2. Severian is lying.
3. (view spoiler) . However, Severian is unaware he is doing this. But that could be all drivel.

I definitely get the sense that Book of the New Sun is not for everyone, and I cannot fault you for not loving it (at all). There were definitely a few starts and stops when I first started the series. However, if you find yourself thinking back to it down the road, I would urge you to give it another go, either to continue, or start again. There is so much more to it.

I don't have the exact bit in the book (it's in the second one I believe) but there is a place where he says he didn't remember something or other, which puts his whole claim of having perfect memory into question (I'll see if I can find it, probably Thecla related). Now, one has to ask, is he knowingly lying about having perfect memory or is he deluding himself?
I must say, being about two weeks after I finished reading the second book, I've probably forgotten more details than I still remember (there's so much!), especially about the House Absolute that I could make absolutely no sense out of. The whole "I escaped some horrid dungeon and oh, think I'll go look for my sword now and in the process find out that person X is also person Y" bit had me bemused.

I don't have the exact bit in the book (it's in the second one I believe) but there is a place where he says he..."
I just read this part which made me question Severian's memory:
"But I can remember more than many would credit: the position of each object on a table I walked past when I was a child, and even that I have recalled some scene to mind previously and how that remembered incident differed from the memory of it I have now."

and...
Silvana wrote: "The treatment on female characters here also reminded me of Dying Earth. Why of course it is easy for them to fall into the MC's arms. And of course the MC loved them all even though he seemed to confuse love and lust and his true love changed every chapter...."
I agree. This is probably the one part about this book that I really hoped would get explained in some way. I felt there must be some reason why Severian's relationships with women are so weird. There are some theories I've read (view spoiler) , but none of them are that convincing in my eyes.

Indeed, however, if you're very keen about it, you'll notice there are slight variations in his retelling of the same events, again and again. So, if he has a perfect memory, why does his story keep changing? That's one of the bigger, and I'd argue, better questions.
As for the Conciliator, you begin to get a sneaking suspicion of an understanding throughout the series, and it gets vaguely explained in the trippiest way possible by the end of the series, even more so in Urth of the New Sun.
Emily wrote: "I just read this part which made me question Severian's memory:
'But I can remember more than many would credit: the position of each object on a table I walked past when I was a child, and even that I have recalled some scene to mind previously and how that remembered incident differed from the memory of it I have now.'"
I've honestly begun to wonder whether all memories are correct. There are some truly mind-bending aspects to the books, like Father Inire's mirrors, for example. A lot of that gets "explained" inasmuch as there are things beyond Severian's comprehension, thus, beyond his ability to explain to the reader. However, if you choose to believe Severian's accounts as his best interpretation of the truth, then there's more than time-travelling green men that influence the narrative.

I can see some merits to the theory in your spoiler(view spoiler) I don't think any of it is in the least conclusive, but damned if it doesn't make me think.

Hoping to make some more progress today and see if I can't get a little more involved.

I have never been able to follow the story in a Gene Wolfe book, which is why I decided not to read this book club read. The writing style is just very confusing to me.

I admit the story is intriguing, but I am not enjoying this enough to want to reread it. I might continue the series if only to achieve some sense of closure, but in regards to this there are so many other books I'd prefer to spend my time on.
All that said, I do find the discussion very helpful in understanding just what the heck is going on.



We all come here to find out it's not just us that's confused, I know I felt better that everyone seems to be having trouble making sense of things :o) I have two unrelated books still to go and then I might try the third book. Don't want to leave it too long or else I'll forget all the weird details and still miss the point when maybe some get explained down the line...

Haha! Exactly this.
I'm now 73% of the way through with this, and I'm still trying to piece things together. It may be that I'm working with the wrong pieces, though.


I disagree. I've read all 4 books three times. I've read many reviews and lengthy discussions by others who have also read it multiple times.
Some of it might make more sense, but all? Absolutely not. The beauty of this book (if there is any) is that the deeper you dig into it, the less it makes sense.


I disagree. I've read all 4 books three times. I've read many reviews and lengthy discussions by others who have also read it multi..."
To me that just sounds terrible, I hate unanswered questions so I'm glad I didn't even pick this book up.

Don't get me wrong. I do recommend reading it, and reading all the way through.
It's just that sometimes, the "value" of a book does not necessarily correspond with how well you understand it, or even how much you like it. This is one of those.
I definitely don't understand it, and the jury's still out on whether or not I even like it, but I see the value in it and consider it a "good" book.
Also, as I mention above, it tends to stick with you and almost dares you to read again and try to figure it all out.


I definitely don't understand it, and the jury's still out on whether or not I even like it, but I see the value in it and consider it a "good" book.
Also, as I mention above, it tends to stick with you and almost dares you to read again and try to figure it all out."
I finally finished this past Friday. I was on an airplane for several hours and made myself finish it. There are now even more things I don't understand. I dislike Severian more than I did when I was halfway through the book.
And yet darn it all...I feel compelled to read the rest of the books in the series. The problem is there are so many other books I would prefer to read, but if I leave a big enough gap between this and the next story, I will be even more lost than I am now.
In trying to understand why I want to keep reading, I've determined that I need closure. Half my brain is warning me that I will not get any closure from this series of books. The other half of my brain can't help but try. Regardless of the complexity and my dislike of the main character, it is well-written and grows on you a bit.

And yet I'm all the more curious about the hints we get along the way about what the New Sun is, who the Concilliator was, what purpose (if any) Severian may have. And even more so, how can one have a conclusion to a story when we don't know yet what the story is :)
Book four is planned for June, since already the few weeks between book 2 and 3 caused me to forget entire incidents, so can't leave it for long.

Looking forward to reading your reactions after you finish.



In the meantime, was wondering if the Long Sun series by Wolfe has any connection to the New Sun? And the Short Sun series. Are they worth a read?

Book 3 is my favourite. I found Mount Typhon to be one of my favourite bits of world-building, and has stuck with me for the past year since I've first (and last) read it. My re-read of Sword & Citadel keeps getting postponed, but it's something I look forward to.
Were you able to make any sense of Severian & Severia? Casdoe? Do you think there is intended symbolism in those names, or do you think Wolfe threw in a purposeful red herring, to say some coincidences are merely that?
It's been a while since I read it, but Fechin, I believe, was described as having long monkey-arms, and I believe Father Inire is also described as ape-like. Did you get the sense there is a connection?
I'm glad you're sticking thru with the series. I look forward to reading your thoughts once you're done.
Books mentioned in this topic
Lexicon Urthus: A Dictionary for the Urth Cycle (other topics)Too Like the Lightning (other topics)
Shadow & Claw (other topics)
The Shadow of the Torturer (other topics)
The Claw of the Conciliator (other topics)
This is an omnibus of The Shadow of the Torturer (1980) & The Claw of the Conciliator (1981), the start of Wolfe's Book of the New Sun series.