On My Shelf discussion
November BOTM
>
November BOTM nominations
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Audrey, Group Founder and President
(new)
Oct 16, 2018 11:28AM
Mod
reply
|
flag
Well, these books I need to read by the end of the year from my shelf so I nominate:Z: A Novel of Zelda Fitzgerald - Therese Anne Fowler
Between Shades of Gray - Ruta Sepetys
The Pearl Thief - Elizabeth Wein
Rose Under Fire - Elizabeth Wein
The Smile - Donna Jo Napoli
The Historian - Elizabeth Kostova
And these from my shelf I just want to get to soon:
The Ripper's Shadow - Laura Joh Rowland
The Pillars of the Earth - Ken Follett (though this is HUGE)
How the García Girls Lost Their Accents - Julia Alvarez
A Quiet Life In The Country - T. E. Kinsey
Her Royal Spyness - Rhys Bowen
Emma - Jane Austen
Wuthering Heights - Emily Brontë
The Thorn Birds - Colleen McCullough
The Shadow of the Wind - Carlos Ruiz Zafón
Ok I think that's enough. lol
rina dunn wrote: "I second between shades of Gray by Ruta Sepetys I loved Salt To The Sea :-)"I loved Salt to the Sea too and have been dying to read her other books!
Is it alright to nominate a sequel like The Lady's Guide to Petticoats and Piracy? If not, instead I'll nominate Pride and Prejudice and The Great Gatsby!
I nominate the following: 1. The Summer Queen - Elizabeth Chadwick
2. The Conquest - Elizabeth Chadwick
3. Daughters of the Grail - Elizabeth Chadwick
4. Helen of Troy - Margaret George
5. Wolf Hall - Hilary Mantel
6. Gallows Thief - Bernard Cornwell
7. The Archer's Tale - Bernard Cornwell
It's okay to nominate sequels. I second The Lady's Guide to Petticoats and Piracy and Pride and Prejudice.
Should we really call many of the books penned by Jane Austen, Charles Dickens, the Brontes etc. historical fiction? Sure, from our perspective, they were written and set in the historic past, but these three authors (and other Regency and Victorian writers) all often if not generally penned their novels concerning their own present, and thus they are not really about the past, but about the authors' own times, set in the past according to us of course, but the authors are actually often writing about what life is like for their contemporaries (the one exception with Dickens being A Tale of Two Cities since it deals with the French Revolution which was of course already an event in the past when Dickens wrote his novel). And no, I am not trying to get books by Austen, Dickens and the like removed or declared as ineligible, this is just some food for thought and consideration.
Manybooks wrote: "Should we really call many of the books penned by Jane Austen, Charles Dickens, the Brontes etc. historical fiction? Sure, from our perspective, they were written and set in the historic past, but ..."I think you're breaking it down too much. I don't really think it matters, it's just a Goodreads group.
Elyse wrote: "Manybooks wrote: "Should we really call many of the books penned by Jane Austen, Charles Dickens, the Brontes etc. historical fiction? Sure, from our perspective, they were written and set in the h..."And I was just musing a bit which I hope I am allowed to do. And if I am not, let me know (but these kinds of musings are common with me).
Stephanie wrote: "Did I miss the poll of what we are reading next month"Nope it hasn't been posted yet!
rina dunn wrote: "Does anybody know what we are reading in November yet? :)"The poll hasn't been posted yet.
Books mentioned in this topic
The Thorn Birds (other topics)Moloka'i (other topics)
What Is Visible (other topics)
The Great Gatsby (other topics)
Pride and Prejudice (other topics)
More...









