The Seasonal Reading Challenge discussion
TASK HELP: Fall Challenge 2019
>
10.9 - Portrait of a Lady
date
newest »
newest »
Melanie wrote: "To clarify, does it need to include most of the woman's body, or are close-ups on the face okay?"
Close-ups are fine as long as you can tell it is a female figure.
Close-ups are fine as long as you can tell it is a female figure.
This is probably a stretch, but would this book work? The bright red lips make me think it's a woman on the cover:
Tracey wrote: "This is probably a stretch, but would this book work? The bright red lips make me think it's a woman on the cover:
"
Sorry, no, there's not enough to tell.
"Sorry, no, there's not enough to tell.
Afternoon. Would this kindle version work?
There is a PB with the same cover, although it's not the top MMPB (where the cover is less clear).
Thanks.
Trish wrote: "Afternoon.
Would this work?
I'd be reading the kindle version, although there is a PB with the
.
Thanks."
Yes, and only the cover for the edition that you read needs to be considered.
Would this work?

I'd be reading the kindle version, although there is a PB with the
.Thanks."
Yes, and only the cover for the edition that you read needs to be considered.
Book Concierge wrote: "Just to be sure .... can the female have her back turned, as long as she is clearly female?
"
yes
"yes
bookwrm526Hi, I wanted to check to make sure that this was a feminine enough figure, since she's definitely not in traditionally female clothes! Thanks.
Jessica wrote: "bookwrm526
Hi, I wanted to check to make sure that this was a feminine enough figure, since she's definitely not in traditionally female clothes! Thanks.
"
yes
Hi, I wanted to check to make sure that this was a feminine enough figure, since she's definitely not in traditionally female clothes! Thanks.
"yes
I'm thinking it's probably a 'no' on this, but thought I'd check:
The drawing doesn't obviously seem to be a girl, but we can assume it is because the word "girl" is in the title.
Ann A wrote: "I'm thinking it's probably a 'no' on this, but thought I'd check:

The drawing doesn't obviously seem to be a girl, but we ca..."
It is a no.

The drawing doesn't obviously seem to be a girl, but we ca..."
It is a no.
I assume this works even though the head and shoulders are missing, because the clothing is obviously female. Agreed?
Aprilleigh wrote: "I assume this works even though the head and shoulders are missing, because the clothing is obviously female. Agreed?
"
Agreed
"Agreed
Books mentioned in this topic
Mr. Churchill's Secretary (other topics)Breed (other topics)
Breed (other topics)
Breed (other topics)
Breed (other topics)
More...























Read a book with a cover that depicts a female figure alone with no other human forms present. Obvious facial or body features and/or traditionally female clothing must be seen.
ex.
Required: Include the cover.