As a Bible Teacher and author of "Prophecy: From Now On..." for a time #14 in the Theology category on the Amazon Bestseller List (#1 in Eschatology) I get asked to write a Commentary on Revelation. That's all we need, right? Instead, how about some people trying to survive the Tribulation events in the Book of Revelation instead.
This is a hybrid type of book where the characters discuss events "on the road" as it were, trying to survive and figure out from the Bible what is happening, and about to happen. That way the reader can learn Revelation in a fictional setting.
This Book (working title: "Revelation - In The Twinkling") takes a straightforward read of the book from the pre-tribulational, pre-millennial perspective and does not attempt to allegorize or assume all kinds of "figurative" language but assumes the Bible simply says what it means and means what it says, and context determines the meaning. Symbolic language is only where it is plain from the text that it is symbolic. You'll have to read it to see what I mean.
Is the story engaging? Are the characters? Can someone learn from this? Does it need more of something or less of something else?
As a Bible Teacher and author of "Prophecy: From Now On..." for a time #14 in the Theology category on the Amazon Bestseller List (#1 in Eschatology) I get asked to write a Commentary on Revelation. That's all we need, right? Instead, how about some people trying to survive the Tribulation events in the Book of Revelation instead.
This is a hybrid type of book where the characters discuss events "on the road" as it were, trying to survive and figure out from the Bible what is happening, and about to happen. That way the reader can learn Revelation in a fictional setting.
This Book (working title: "Revelation - In The Twinkling") takes a straightforward read of the book from the pre-tribulational, pre-millennial perspective and does not attempt to allegorize or assume all kinds of "figurative" language but assumes the Bible simply says what it means and means what it says, and context determines the meaning. Symbolic language is only where it is plain from the text that it is symbolic. You'll have to read it to see what I mean.
Is the story engaging? Are the characters? Can someone learn from this? Does it need more of something or less of something else?