Goodreads Authors/Readers discussion
II. Publishing & Marketing Tips
>
Why Spoilers in Book Reviews Are Often a Good Thing
date
newest »


As a reader, I hate getting a good plot twist ruined.
I would go as far as to stay that it might prevent me from wanting to read the book.

I have read the end of a book at times to see if I want to finish for example if children are in harm and I want to know if they survive.

Of course that's okay, Helen! 🙂

That's basically what I say in the blog post. 😄 I wrote it because it's seemed to me that not everyone knows the legitimate roles that spoilers play in the readers' domain of book reviews. And when I hear authors tell readers to never include spoilers in reviews, the authors may not realize they could be lessening the exposure and suppressing the buzz about their own books. Yikes!

I didn't try to define spoiler in the blog post, since different things spoil a story for different readers. 😄 But I wrote the blog post with the hope of making more people aware of what spoilers are for and how they may best be handled—especially for authors who take a "zero tolerance" stance on spoilers but may want to rethink it.

There is a separate informative category - content advisories - that allows readers to know whether the material contains content that many readers may find offensive - extreme violence, torture, violence against animals, offensive language, and so on. An example of this would be the "Parental guides" on a film's page on IMDB.
I would not read a review that spoiled the plot. On the other hand, I do appreciate a content advisory because there is some material I prefer to avoid.
Blog post: Why Spoilers in Book Reviews Are Often a Good Thing
https://wp.me/pwlMY-b8n