Nature Book Group discussion

We agreed that it was a very descriptive, closely observed book. But while most of us enjoyed the pictures evoked, it wasn't to everyone's taste, mainly because it lacked a central argument, scientific basis and precise locations. While it was refreshing not to have the narrator's personal life front, left and centre, we felt that a bit more context would have been useful.

I'm sorry had to miss the in-person discussion of this book. I've written some of my thoughts about it as part of my most recent Substack post which you can read here: https://ruthbradshaw.substack.com/p/n...