Pewdiepie Book Review 2025 discussion
January
>
Tao Te Ching
message 1:
by
Mitch
(new)
Dec 25, 2024 07:57AM

reply
|
flag


Obviously take it with a grain of salt - but I asked ChatGPT which translated version is generally recommended. It resulted in an answer which I think actually seems pretty balanced in that you still have to sort of determine that for yourself to a large extent.
I don't think Pewdiepie gave a clear indication on which version to use so personally I'm going to give that the benefit of the doubt and just assume he intentionally left the version unspecified.
Lastly - I wouldn't worry too too much about getting the same version as everyone else because each of us potentially having different versions could lead to some fantastic discussion, since it can and probably will result in various points of view from which to converse from, which is to be embraced in a discussion forum like this.
So,
The answer chatgpt returned:
Recommendations Based on Goals:
For a poetic and approachable version: Stephen Mitchell or Ursula K. Le Guin.
For scholarly study: D.C. Lau, Thomas Cleary, or Red Pine.
For visual and meditative reading: Gia-Fu Feng and Jane English.
For exploring deeper nuances: Jonathan Star or Red Pine.
I don't think Pewdiepie gave a clear indication on which version to use so personally I'm going to give that the benefit of the doubt and just assume he intentionally left the version unspecified.
Lastly - I wouldn't worry too too much about getting the same version as everyone else because each of us potentially having different versions could lead to some fantastic discussion, since it can and probably will result in various points of view from which to converse from, which is to be embraced in a discussion forum like this.
So,
The answer chatgpt returned:
Recommendations Based on Goals:
For a poetic and approachable version: Stephen Mitchell or Ursula K. Le Guin.
For scholarly study: D.C. Lau, Thomas Cleary, or Red Pine.
For visual and meditative reading: Gia-Fu Feng and Jane English.
For exploring deeper nuances: Jonathan Star or Red Pine.

Happy New Year everyone!

Thanks for creating this group btw!

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/4...
(It's translated by Arthur Waley)
There's a lot of fun to be had in comparing versions and it might help with the collective understanding of the transcript.
Looking forward to read everyone's opinion and ideas on the matter ^^

This book club might just have been the thing I needed so I am very glad to be here. Looking forward to this year.
Happy Reading everyone!


I am confused about that too! Also, did any of you get any email after filling out the form?



I did as well, as Le Guin's translation was the one available at a local library. Read it today, and I can say it does not disappoint! My personal favorite was Chapter 33, entitled "Kinds of Power."
Hope you all enjoy and gain something from the text.

I was going to go with that, but after looking a bit in the sample it seemed a little too much for me as it felt like it might be better suited for a deeper study rather than an initial casual read, including commentary and a more literal translation. So I will go for the Mitchell translation I think, as it seems easier and more fluid to read, and maybe go for the Ames/Hall translation if I want to deep-dive into the Tao at a later time ^^
I would suggest comparing some different translations and find one you like, there are multiple sites where you can do this (one being ttc.tasuki.org).
Excited to start reading the books! Bought 'Discourses and Selected Writings', 'The Republic' and 'The Wisdom of Life' soon to be 4 years ago after one of his book review videos, but never read them x3 Hopefully, this book club will finally give me the push to read them ^^




Took me 35 min to finish it! Book 1 down 11 to go!
Question for everyone, when it’s our turn to pick a book are you guys going to select a book following the theme or pick something completely different?

Pls let me know: do you just not care if you understand fully?





This version is surprisingly not as popular as others, but I'm really enjoying this translation thanks to this book's unique style where the book opens with Tao Te Ching's text on the right side (odd # pages) and a nearly line-by-line explanation of the text on the left (even # pages). As Lin explains, this method lets him translate the text as closely to the original as possible (preserving its beauty & power) without the fear of losing their meaning to the modern Western audience since his close explanations explain every line.
If you still haven't decided on the translation, I definitely recommend Derek Lin's version! Although some may consider it over-explained, it was definitely helpful to me as someone who's never read any Eastern philosophy before. Of course, as others mention, the best way is to read multiple versions yourself (and I'm sure other translations are also great), but I'm eager to read the other books on this list first so I'll just stick to one version for now haha.

As for the current book, it actually gets easier along the way! I have around 10 verses left after a week of slow reading and it feels like I’m learning more closer to the end! I’ll probably reread the beginning, might have missed some of the ideas
Also, I’m glad to read your comments, it’s so nice to have a group for that! Although I don’t know how to reply to the comments in the app 😄
I wonder if Felix will create an official group, there were no emails after filling out the form. So excited to see what he’s going to do!

For those wondering which version to
read - there's no "original text" which the lecture explains and the translations tend to have different leanings (i.e. philosophical or religious).
It seems any text will need to have a comentary for the reader to tackle most of the passages. I have a baby and can't really sit and read - ill be dependent on audiobooks and the free recordings I've found don't have commentary. So if like me, you're reliant on audio books, you may want to check out the lecture I've referenced here or others to get more out of this month's book.
Search on youtube: Tao Te Ching it's many lives. Prof Franklin Perkins

Just a tip for anyone who has finished it fairly sooner. Try to read it again and think about how life will be affected if you start practising these principles. As it is fairly common with any original text of philosophy, it can be translated in many numbers of forms and is different for every single person reading and practising.


Especially, quote: "The text is in philosophical terms a summary of conclusions. The arguments on which they are based must be sought elsewhere."
These chapters are so highly condenced, only pure beauty remains! So there indeed is alot to unpack.
Would it be somthing to make some topics under the January Discussion here in this group? Are there people intrested in going a bit more in depth on the contents of Toa Te Ching? I would love to see how other people interpret the concept of Toa for example. Because it's so abstract right? It's just, "the most nothing nothing can be, the Path".
So amazing to see that concept giving birth to so many ideas that contest their own existance in a way.

"Tao Te Ching: The Taoism of Lao Tzu Explained" by Stefan Stenudd.
I'm reading it alongside Red Pine's version, which I find very useful for the insights it provides from old masters.
Happy reading!






Firstly, its clearly aimed at rulers. Presumably in response to the unrest of the times. It encourages non-interference from the government which I'm all for. It's very - don't step on me XD
Some critiques - I find the teachings non human and contradictory at times.
E.g. 1) Value leads to theft so hold nothing of value? You place value on absolutely everything else why would you have it. If its leaning towards luxury goods - isn't this the eradication of art? I also find it bizarre that the answer to immoral people who steal is to have nothing worth stealing. That's like saying better kill yourself so no one can murder you. Is he talking about wealth instead disparity? Its counter to human nature and in my view not possible through force without heavy government interference which he is against.
I read that it isn't poverty that leads to crime but wealth disparity, so I can see what lau zu is talking about when he says that wealth begets theft, however in our modern day society we are exposed to all sorts of people from around the world via the internet rather than some years before where you were just seeing what you were surrounded by in your immediate area. We're comparing ourselves to to the world now and it seems unavoidable. Rather than removing the opportunity to covet, I think we need to work on our tendencies to compare and want. But I imagine those who would want to work on those things wouldn't be stealing in the first place.
E.g. 2) "No one is dear to the sage. Give to others as you would your parents". I just don't believe humans are capable of this.
E.g. 3) Impartiality is divine. Are the teachings not partial to goodness? Or to non interference? To never take a side would mean allowing evil and to not think. Neither is good in my view.
E.g. 4) "Throw away morality and justice and people will do the right thing" I don't think I agree. I think, in general people do the right thing because that's required to survive in a society, however in our modern day society, our independence is greater compared to earlier times (rather, it seems that way) and we're less obviously reliant on others. I think that leads to the unconscious thinking that there is less need to act in moral ways and I think in those instances a moral framework is important to hammer into people. It also seems contradictory because at times the text will refer to the man's decent heart and not using weapons because that's evil. I don't understand how they can talk about doing away with a system of morality and then referring to one later in the text.
Some things I liked-
"The bliss of eternity can be found in contentment". I like this line and I would like to apply this to my own life more frequently by being grateful for what I have. Although it's not clear to me if they are saying not to envy or not to desire at all. If the former, I will try to apply it to my own life more consciously and I will try not to be discontent.
Selfless action leads to fulfilment - this is similar to Christian teachings and I like this message. This is something id like to do more of.
Soft/yielding overcoming the hard - maybe as a female I have an understanding of this that males wont as there is definitely a way of dealing with the opposite sex that leads to better outcomes XD. I have certainly found this to be true pretty much most of the time. Not just for positive outcomes but for not allowing yourself to be muddied with anger and conflict.
I find similarities with Christianity and Buddhism and there are some passages that are cryptic and mystic that make it seem like he's privy to the Secrets of the origin of the universe and what Life is and what happens after we die. No more to add to this - just a comment.
As far as life teachings go, I prefer stoicism but I took some good things from this text.

my favorite chapters were 22 and 76. I thought the book got better toward the end.


Same! Some of the content felt too ambiguous (or maybe too little!) for me! If there's a video you've found to be good I'd love to watch it :D

For the free months, does anybody have any book recommendations? I was thinking of reading some fiction books for a good changeup, thanks!

I've just read it but it's not something I’ll sit and read cover to cover again, but rather return to certain chapters when I feel the need to let them sink in more. I won’t follow any order or try to 'finish' it, because it feels like this book isn’t meant to be finished—it’s more like an ongoing conversation with myself that keeps evolving