Underground Knowledge — A discussion group discussion

5 views
FRINGE SCIENCE > Are the Limits of Human Perception Fixed — or Expanding?

Comments Showing 1-3 of 3 (3 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Raphaël (new)

Raphaël Zéla | 20 comments For those who enjoy the space between science and imagination…

Throughout history, human beings believed that the limits of perception were fixed — that our senses defined our reality.
But modern neuroscience, quantum theory, and even literature suggest the opposite:
every shift in consciousness expands what we can perceive… and therefore changes the “structure” of reality itself.

So my question is:

Do you believe that human perception is biologically limited?
Or can awareness, solitude, trauma, creativity, or spiritual experiences expand the borders of what we are capable of perceiving?

I’d love to hear your thoughts — scientific, philosophical, or purely intuitive.

— Raphaël Zéla


message 2: by Dr. (new)

Dr. Jasmine | 40 comments Raphaël wrote: "For those who enjoy the space between science and imagination…

Throughout history, human beings believed that the limits of perception were fixed — that our senses defined our reality.
But modern ..."


Good morning :))

I feel that no one can answer your question better than Napoleon:

“The extent of your consciousness is limited only by your ability to love and to embrace with your love the space around you, and all it contains.”
― Napoleon Bonapart

As for trauma, altered senses, new physics theories etc- if they alter your ability to love, then yes, they contribute :)

Jasmine


message 3: by Soren (new)

Soren Blackwood | 34 comments Raphaël wrote: "For those who enjoy the space between science and imagination…

Throughout history, human beings believed that the limits of perception were fixed — that our senses defined our reality.
But modern ..."


This is a phenomenal question, Raphaël, and it touches on the absolute heart of the human dilemma.

I believe the answer lies in understanding the difference between the hardware and the interpreter.

The biological mechanical structures of our senses are fixed by design—we can't see more light or hear more frequency. But the perception itself is driven by the state of the consciousness interpreting that data.

The greatest difficulty lies here: When we seek expansion through isolation, solitude, or trauma, our ego demands a return: "What utility will I gain?" This makes the whole exercise an ego-driven spa visit, a mere enhancement of the personal program.

The true breakthrough is realizing that the act of perception is not about us at all. The goal is not to find personal wisdom, but to realize our place in the Universal Equation.

The moment we realize we are not the center—that we are a vital, conscious component of a massive, evolving, and orderly system—the question shifts from "What am I perceiving for me?" to "What must I perceive for the Universal progression?"

The ultimate utility of expanded consciousness is moving things toward their intended end by the intended means. This requires a quiet ego that can observe the process without interference.

This pursuit of the Universal GPS, rather than the personal, is the central mystery that drives my work, The Sentinel Project.

Thank you for starting this essential conversation.

Soren K. Blackwood


back to top