Historical Fiction Books discussion

48 views
Historical Book Reviews > How old is "historical"?

Comments Showing 1-10 of 10 (10 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by William (new)

William Smith (smithwil) | 7 comments How old must the setting be to 'qualify' for 'historical' in your opinion? 1900? 1920? 1950? 1987? 1996? 2006? Do any of these qualify? Thanks! ;-)


message 2: by Thom (new)

Thom Swennes (Yorrick) | 5 comments Mod
Officially anything in the past is history. I hate to think of my generation as history, but it is. I suppose one could consider any time that differs from the present is history. To tell the truth, I find this concept easier to accept then the yesterday is history perception. When one considers that next year’s college freshmen were probably born in 1991 (before internet, cell phones and DVD’s), history isn’t far away.


message 3: by William (new)

William Smith (smithwil) | 7 comments Thom wrote: "Officially anything in the past is history. I hate to think of my generation as history, but it is. I suppose one could consider any time that differs from the present is history. To tell the truth..."
Thank you, Thom. This tends to confirm my thinking. My first novel is set in 1987. I put news headllines of the day at the start of each chapter. It is a story about a family of the time. Fiction, but they feel very real. The second novel, The Homeplace Revisited, is set nine years later, in 1996. Again, this is 15 years ago... a life-time to younger folks. See the headlines, they feel ancient.
Thanks, again, for your comments! ;-)


message 4: by Andrea (new)

Andrea Jackson (paperbackdiva) Do you have a publisher in mind to submit it to? For practical purposes, you need to go by what they say is historical. Instead of historical, it might be considered 'vintage' or 'retro' or something else. The only thing I'm sure of is that you couldn't call it contemp! :)


message 5: by William (new)

William Smith (smithwil) | 7 comments Andrea wrote: "Do you have a publisher in mind to submit it to? For practical purposes, you need to go by what they say is historical. Instead of historical, it might be considered 'vintage' or 'retro' or somethi..."
Thank you for your comments, Andrea. At this point, I'm thinking from a marketing perspective... to identify readers. Both novels are published via a small family publishing company, without a wide distribution network. I might affiliate with a publisher with wider distribution, but right now, my concern is efficiency in getting the story out to the right potential readers. I'm intrigued by 'vintage' and 'retro' - can you tell me more? Thanks, again. ;-)


message 6: by Andrea (new)

Andrea Jackson (paperbackdiva) Certainly, William. Vintage is usually set in the 1920's or '30's. I'm not so sure about the term 'retro' but what I was thinking of was the 70s-80s.

I'm not sure what you mean about the small family publisher vs. the other kind. Most publishers, no matter how small, have submission guidelines. If you self-publish that would mean a more direct link to the readers. It seems you've already noted that you need to identify a specific group of readers to target.


message 7: by Thom (new)

Thom Swennes (Yorrick) | 5 comments Mod
Willam it seems like your books could be classified as 'retro' and 'modern retro'. My question is why is it important to classify it as anything? What’s classified today as ‘retro’ will eventually achieve a categorization of ‘classical’ and even ‘ancient’. It doesn’t, however, really say anything about the work. A much better cataloging (if one has to be) is readable or unreadable. If a particular piece of prose is satisfying to its author to write and fulfilling, enjoyable and rewarding for that majority that pick it up and take the time to read it; it can be classified as a success. That must inevitably be the bottom line for all.


message 8: by William (new)

William Smith (smithwil) | 7 comments Excellent additional comments, that I really appreciate. Thank you. My readers have certainly told me the books are readable. Most say they couldn't put them down... wanting to know what comes next. Thank you. You have been very helpful, each of you. ;-)


message 9: by Kirsten (new)

Kirsten McKenzie (kirstenmckenzieauthor) | 3 comments I'm not sure something from the 70s/80s would be classified as historical fiction. Could you better call it Crime? Mystery? Saga? And avoid categorising it as Historical/Retro fiction at all?


message 10: by William (new)

William Smith (smithwil) | 7 comments Kirsten wrote: "I'm not sure something from the 70s/80s would be classified as historical fiction. Could you better call it Crime? Mystery? Saga? And avoid categorising it as Historical/Retro fiction at all?"

I do now promote all of my writing, which tells the story of "The Homeplace" community in the Southern Missiouri Ozarks from 1833 to the present as "Family Saga" stories. Thank you for your comment!! ;-)


back to top