More than Just a Rating discussion
Reviews of our Reviews
>
Vlad's Reviews!
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Cheryl, first facilitator
(last edited Dec 23, 2011 03:30PM)
(new)
Dec 23, 2011 03:29PM
Mod
reply
|
flag
Wow. Y'know, even though I'm trained as a teacher and love children's books, I've never read Johnny Tremain. Your review does a perfect job of convincing me to skip it.
You're obviously thoughtful and intelligent, so I want to say something more than 'good job' about all the effort you put into your reviews. So, here's a possible suggestion: Maybe for this one you want to try to say a bit about why you think it's so popular & famous. Is it just because teachers need historical fiction to help them reach their students? Is there something the book does that you don't like but other people might like?
Oh, and possibly you might want to offer other related works that readers could choose instead of this one, if you know of any worth recommending.
I look forward to reading more of your reviews in the future!
You're obviously thoughtful and intelligent, so I want to say something more than 'good job' about all the effort you put into your reviews. So, here's a possible suggestion: Maybe for this one you want to try to say a bit about why you think it's so popular & famous. Is it just because teachers need historical fiction to help them reach their students? Is there something the book does that you don't like but other people might like?
Oh, and possibly you might want to offer other related works that readers could choose instead of this one, if you know of any worth recommending.
I look forward to reading more of your reviews in the future!
Hm. I personally would prefer to read reviews with a bit more tact. The review, in my very own personal opinion, shouldn't be too much about the how clever the reviewer is.
And re Blubber, especially, a nod to the fans of the novel, a mention of something redeeming (even if only in the history of the book) would help the review be more believable and effective. Trashing the book in the manner that you did makes it seem like you think people who liked it are idiots. Which means you'll lose credibility, because really, there's no way that all the tens of thousands (or whatever) people who loved the book are that stupid or blind.
Just my own reaction. I do know lots of people here on GR like biting reviews, so I don't speak for that segment of the membership. :)
And of course you are clever, and coherent, and you do pretty much justify your opinions, so keep it up!
And re Blubber, especially, a nod to the fans of the novel, a mention of something redeeming (even if only in the history of the book) would help the review be more believable and effective. Trashing the book in the manner that you did makes it seem like you think people who liked it are idiots. Which means you'll lose credibility, because really, there's no way that all the tens of thousands (or whatever) people who loved the book are that stupid or blind.
Just my own reaction. I do know lots of people here on GR like biting reviews, so I don't speak for that segment of the membership. :)
And of course you are clever, and coherent, and you do pretty much justify your opinions, so keep it up!
Huh? I have no opinion of Twilight, much less of the folks who read it. It's the phrasing of your review of Blubber that's suspect. I didn't mean to start an off-topic discussion, sorry for the confusion.

