Art Lovers discussion
Art Museum Forum
>
The Phillips Collection, Washington, DC
date
newest »
newest »
I love the works you posted, Lobstergirl! In reading the captions, I feel the title of the piece fits that particular picture. Red Chimneys of course, is fairly a given. I do like that work.
Arthur Dove Rain or Snow does give the painting life, I can almost feel the falling of the elements!
I like the shadowing in Rockwell Kent The Road Roller and the particular position of the animal in front seems to give it movement.
George Inness Moonlight, Tarpon Springs . The cloud cover over the moon is magnificent!
Really not a big Rothko fan.
The title by Ben Shahn, Still Music is perfect. I would love to see that one. Actually I would love to see any or all of them!
I am now going to show my ignorance but, is there a word describing when one can see the outlines of the forms as in Harold Weston, Snow Squall? I kind of like that.
I've always liked Klee.
Thank you again, Lobstergirl!
You're welcome. I like the way Harold Weston uses outline, too. Here's another example - not at the Phillips.
March Thaw, 1921
Duncan Phillips began collecting works by Weston in the late 1920s, and in his writings, Phillips compared Weston to Van Gogh. Phillips wrote: "[Weston’s art] is something earthy and rugged and at the same time of a lyric poignancy, something unguardedly and tactlessly frank yet tenderly humane.” Duncan and Marjorie Phillips became close friends of the artist, who had four solo exhibitions at the museum. (museum website)
I'm just curious, Carol. Not demeaning anyone's work, but what do you see in the Rothko? How does it make you feel?
Have you seen one in person? It's all about color and form -- I love the vibrancy and how huge his canvases are.
Size is definitely part of it. They're huge. Many people speak of the spiritual or meditative mood they inspire.
No, I haven't seen one in person. I did see Simon Schama's Rothko presentation. I really liked the way he presented the various paintings. He actually made me think. I can see how size could definitely be part of it. It would incite awe anyway, if nothing else.
I work in DC, and on an occasional slow day, will go off for an extended lunch hour and visit the Phillips Collection. I agree that it's a wonderful small museum -- often I will have a better experience at a smaller museum than at a super-hyped destination museum. (For example, the MOMA in NYC. After they doubled the size of the MOMA a few years ago, they also quadrupled the attendance, so now you have to wait in line to buy a ticket, wait in line to enter with your ticket, join a crowd going up and down the escalators. Yes, the MOMA does have many great works on display, but the crowds gather around them ...)On the other hand, the Phillips is quiet and cheerful. There are masterpieces from American and European art of 19th and 20th century, with some older pictures mixed in, such as a fine El Greco. Many people are drawn to the the Renoir masterpiece, Luncheon at the Boating Party, but there is much more. Special exhibitions, and rotating selections from the permanent collection.
(Of course, if you are in DC and you are an art addict, you could spend a week going to all the great museums -- National Gallery, SAAM/NPG, Hirschorn, Freer/Sackler, Renwick, Corcoran ...)
Lobstergirl,Yes, you are right. In that photo I'm standing in the sculpture garden at the Hirschorn. Good catch. I like that rabbit a lot.
(More than a week would be nice -- so many good museums, most of them (Smithsonian ones) free.)




Charles DeMuth, Red Chimneys
Arthur Dove, Rain or Snow
Lyonel Feininger, Waterfront
Philip Guston, The Lesson
Rockwell Kent, The Road Roller
George Inness, Moonlight, Tarpon Springs
Mark Rothko, Ochre and Red on Red
Theodoros Stamos, Mosses
Ben Shahn, Still Music
Julian Alden Weir, New England Barnyard
Harold Weston, Snow Squall
Paul Klee, Small Picture of a Regatta
http://www.phillipscollection.org/hom...