The Sword and Laser discussion
Ebook Pricing
date
newest »


I can order a used paper back for 39 cents
or buy the ebook version for $12.99.

I agree that sometimes the difference between dead-tree books and e-books is ridiculous, but I also found a lot of pretty cheap ebooks (with paperbacks and hardcover still in the "normal" price range).

The other issue is that book prices don't reflect the cost of printing. Simply put, the higher cost of hardbacks is not to compensate for higher printing costs, but to target the price insensitive market who are wiling to pay a premium to avoid wait times for mass market paperbacks. If people want ebooks to be concurrent with hardback release then they'll be priced high, out the whole business model will have to be re done.
The lack of international availability is due to the total mess that its the fragmented English language market. Eg, Tor might have the north America rights, but if Orbit have the UK rights then Tor can't go selling the ebook in the UK... even if no one has the UK rights Tor can't sell the books in the UK without buying the rights, which they won't do without it being worth their while to have an international division. There's some additional messiness here with distribution rights vs publishing rights that I don't totally understand.
All this is horrifically intractable because most books aren't really published by publishing companies, but by publishing divisions within huge companies like newscorp or Disney who are having a larger, angrier row with the internet.
tl;dr don't hold your breath for this to change.
Boilerplate: I don't work in publishing, the above is what I've pieced together from reading everything I can about the subject, quizzing a friend who works for OUP, watching some other friends get published, and some basic primers on economics.
So take it with a pinch of salt.

I think we can blame the publishing industry, at least in part. It costs them a lot of money to print books, so they want to sell them. If they don't don't charge outrageous prices for ebooks, no one will buy the hard copies. You might be a few years ahead of the curve, but I think they will come around eventually.
We can also point some fingers at authors who believe that since ebooks are so much easier to steal, they shouldn't publish in that format. While it may be true that ebooks are easier to steal, not publishing in digital format is pointless when it only takes one thief with a scanner to make it available to all the other thieves.
I remember a few years ago when Joanne Rowling refused to publish the Harry Potter novels as ebooks because she was afraid they would get stolen. I couldn't make it past the first book, but if I had wanted the ebooks, I could have downloaded all of them that day--but I wouldn't have been able to pay for them.
Ray Bradbury has been against ebooks for years, but when he recently tried to get Fahrenheit 451 republished, none of the publishers would agree to take it unless they also got the digital rights. If you've ever read Fahrenheit 451, you might see a bit of irony there, but I guess that's a sign that the publishing industry is making an effort to adjust to the new reality.

http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-...
Darryl wrote: "
I remember a few years ago when Joanne Rowling refused to publish the Harry Potter novels as ebooks because she was afraid they would get stolen. I couldn't make it past the first book, but if I had wanted the ebooks, I could have downloaded all of them that day--but I wouldn't have been able to pay for them."
Giver her a break, it was 2005, the internets were a scary place back then. She's on the side of the angels now though, Pottermore is going to be selling the ebooks with drm.

Well, yes. But I wanted to illustrate how the publishing is changing, and I figured that example would be the best one out of the many I've heard. :-)
Though it sure seems like it took her a long time to figure out that fans might actually WANT to pay for her books.


When I finish my ebooks, I can't resell them for credit towards new ebooks, I can't loan them to a friend, and I can't give them away. As mentioned above, I also may have paid the same amount for my ebook as I would have for a paper copy.
I think people are used to books being able to circulate more fluidly and since the industry hasn't substantially addressed this issue yet, many people resort to piracy. I think Amazon (and hopefully some new competitors) need to follow Itunes' example of making their content attuned to their users' needs in a way that it started becoming easier and more desirable for people to obtain their music the 'right way.'
It's good that ebooks are available at libraries and I heard that there is a sharing program for Kindle where you can link accounts with a certain number or other people -- that sounds like a good start. I'm definitely looking for more innovation than that, though.

http://www.antipope...."
One thing I take issue with is this bit:
I get this a lot from dedicated ebook readers: "I don't care about formatting and design in ebooks!"
I think this is a peculiar kind of brain damage or mental scarring that mostly afflicts those who have read one too many OCR'd and badly proof-read scans of pirate copies on their Palm III with a 160x160 pixel black and white display. To reach a mass audience, ebooks are going to have to be comparably readable to a dead tree edition: sensible use of screen fonts, layout directives, and some eyeball candy are all part of the package.
No, no, no, please, no. I frelling hate it when publishers add fancy fonts to ebooks. The whole point of an ereader is that I get to control the display, and I set it to a font and size that I find readable. I've had ebooks where the publisher's embedded font is tiny even at my default setting, or where the font is an ugly POS.
By all means, ebooks need formatting, but it's stuff that can be done in HTML with h1, h2, h3, p, i and b tags. That's it. Unless there's a need for some fancy layout, I don't want any formatting beyond paragraph breaks and chapter titles.


I want to be clear that I'm not complaining about paying for what I read. It's the (crazy) pricing and the fact that I can't easily buy what I want at the moment due to the seemingly arbitrary rules that are puzzling me at the moment.
Eric Flint wrote a series of articles about the economics of epublishing that I think are well worth reading. I haven't found a link to a free version of them - they were published in the Jim Baen's Universe series.
Jerry Pournelle had some interesting comments also in the last This Week in Tech podcast. He said that he'd most likely self-publish now in the ebook era, and was considering doing that for books coming out of contract.

When I started reading eBooks it was on a Windows Mobile device and they used the .lit format. I purchased some books from Amazon and they are just gone now. I have no way to get them back.
I haven't tried it out yet, but at least some of the Amazon titles are able to be 'loaned' to friends for a period of time.
And libraries are starting to have ebooks available for loan, although I've yet to find that useful because the number of titles is very limited here.
As I said in my initial post, I've been purchasing from Baen for quite a while and one reason is their policy of no DRM. The thing that finally convinced me to get the Kindle was that I can logon to my Baen collection and send books I've purchased over the past few years to the Kindle.
If you want to try it, you can with the Baen Free Library http://www.baen.com/library/, where they encourage you to get into series and authors by downloading selected titles.
I just noticed that one of my favourite books is now available - Warriors Apprentice by Lois McMaster Bujold.

Baen is awesome. I got an email on Jan. 4 that have moved to http://www.baenebooks.com/.
Have you tried http://www.smashwords.com/ ? It's an indie publishing site, but no DRM, and they offer ebooks in multiple formats. Once you a buy a book, you can download it any time in any format.
Oooo, a new Honor Harrington...

I don't think Amazon was helping at first.. When I first created Kindle versions of my books (3 years ago) I wanted to sell them for .99 or free... But Amazon set the price, just below what they were charging for the print editions.
I really don't see ebooks as being owned, it's more like they're being rented. You're locked into a system with drm and it's a bogus investment in bits. The price should reflect that.
If the publishers don't see this soon they'll be removed from the equation... They're nervous that their gatekeeper position is threatened and they're holding on for dear life.

Andy, that authors are starting to self-publish, or more specifically let their agents do the publishing was one of the points Jerry Pournelle was making.
He also said that in his opinion it was imperative to retain an external editor as very few authors can self-edit.

Most of the large companies don't have the things they need to face the new challenges. I heard Jerry discussing that on TWiT and he's totally on the mark... he's also had good editorial experiences. That's not always the case.

Speaking of ebook prices, some of the free stuff on Smashwords is pretty good. N.V. Binder, also a Goodreads user, has a free but short space opera called New Year's Day, which was a lot of fun. She's made it available almost everywhere.




Ebooks is a different ball game entirely.

It seems to me a new author would benefit more from an editor with business savvy than a publisher these days. Business minded authors are even better off.

You sell e-books for 99 cents, DRM free.
You'll sell a million copies and
still make more money then you would with print.
Same as what happened with music.


Except it was apparently Apple that was behind the publishers asking Amazon to raise their prices in the first place..
MSNBC/The Wall Street Journal wrote: "The whole agreement was actually launched at the behest of Apple’s Steve Jobs, who had wanted to create an e-bookstore for the iPad but didn’t want to compete with Amazon.com’s cheap titles."
Full article

I'm shocked, I tell you shocked!

In an effort to get publishers to sign up for the iBook store, Apple said the publishers could charge what they want... Amazon didn't like that at all.
For a while, Amazon even made the PRINT versions vanish from their site of anyone who sided with Apple.
The backlash from this was so big with the tthat eventually Amazon let them charge what they wanted.
So we got more options but lost the low prices.

Maybe even Google could join in the fray.
Something along the lines of what happened with music.
The consumer ends up with cheap DRM free products.
That'll work.

That is where their value is to the author.
Book agents and book editors can handle the rest in the ebook market.

Maybe even Google could join in the fray.
Something along the lines of what happened with music.
The consumer ends up with cheap DRM ..."
Except that the publishers won't allow Amazon to charge what they want (and Apple doesn't want to set prices themselves), so it's impossible for anyone to compete on price with ebooks. The publishers said you either sell it for what we say or we'll just pull all our books.
This is why most books above the $9.99 price on Amazon say "This price was set by the publisher".
This is probably one of the only times in history where more competition (Apple joined in the ebook business) resulted in a price increase across the board.


Sooner or later some one will release 'Do it your self" software.
Then the book will go from the author to the editor/agent to the distributer. The publishers end up filing Chapter 11
Two years ago I gave away (to a good cause) eight big boxes of books, some of which I'd owned for a very long time. Now I was looking at having to do it again because the shelves were chockablock.
I've always liked the idea of ebooks. I've been buying them for years, but wouldn't have considered totally going over to them until the latest Kindle came out. It converted me and I declared that I would no longer purchase fiction on paper.
The problem I've found in the last few months though, is that Amazon is extraordinarily restrictive and, perhaps, profiteering.
Firstly, living in Australia, I only have access to a small subset of the books available in the USA. Secondly, I can't purchase Kindle books from Amazon France at all (Heaven forfend that someone should be interested in reading in more than one language!). And thirdly I'm starting to see books in Kindle format costing more than hard copy books, which defeats the whole rationale as I understood it!
Take the latest S&L pick for example. On Amazon I can order the Stross Rule 34 for $US7.99 in paperback, but they want to charge me $US20.82 for the Kindle edition!!!
WTF!?