Deadline
discussion
What do you think about the ending? was anybody mad?
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Daphne
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Feb 24, 2012 02:39PM

reply
|
flag

-Elizabeth Reuter
Author, Demon of Renaissance Drive

I thought this book was a real step down from "Feed".

@Michael: Why did you feel it was a step down from feed? That's a statement your throwing out there without an explanation and, aside from the point it isn't even related to the original posted question, doesn't really add anything to the discussion. Care to elaborate?

@Michael: Why did you feel it was a..."
@Holden - Easy there bud...the question was about whether the ending made you mad...I think expressing that the not just the ending, but the book as a whole was a letdown (an emotional reaction) is fairly related to the question. As for details, I have no idea why Michael felt that way, but I agree. Specifically, I felt the 2nd book offered a lot less plot density for the number of pages.
To answer the original poster's question...no, it didn't make me mad. Quite the opposite, I thought it was rather clever. The story so far has really centered on speculation regarding medical advances...whether beneficial or harmful. Taking the story in this direction, combined with what we've learned about Shaun & George rescued my interest in reading a third.


I did pause at the end to wonder if this twist took away from the strong emotional drive of Deadline, but I ultimately decided that it didn't. It was all still there, and just because I learned something later that changes things, doesn't change the experience I had of reading the book without that knowledge.
It's kind of like getting to have it both ways. I'm fine with it.








all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic