The Chaperone
discussion
Proud of Cora
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Dani
(new)
-
rated it 3 stars
Aug 07, 2012 02:09PM

reply
|
flag








The book covered so much - prohibition, no legal contraceptives, moralizing, rigidity, self-fulfillment, corsets, segregation etc. so you have lots of topics to choose from. Just talking about the difference between Kansas and New York City at the time and discussing where each book club member would have preferred to live would be interesting or whether each member would prefer to have lived during that time or now. This so much that could be discussed about the book.
I thought the author did a wonderful job writing a philosophical book of sorts. It caused me frequently to ask and wonder - What if? Would I? How could? That’s why I think it would be a terrific book club selection.
Also it was rated fairly high by most readers and made in to the top 10 in the Goodreads' vote for historical fiction, so most of your members will likely enjoy the book.
If you choose Chaperone for your club, please let this discussion group know how it goes. Enjoy!!

Totally agree! Well said.



I was very impressed with Cora and the choices she made. This is the last paragraph of my book review:
This book had a great deal to say to me. It approached many issues which are relevant in this age of face book and reality television. There’s a clear message. Louise Brooks became a scandalous public figure with every aspect of her self-destructing private life in view. Cora remained quietly private, with a socially acceptable public face. She lived her unconventional life without undo collateral damage. I’d like to shake her hand.


Thank you Mj. My reviews are all posted on Goodreads, but I don't often participate in discussions. I like the discussion format on shelfari better and there are only so many minutes in the day....... and so many books to read.

In any case, I did appreciate your comment in this discussion group.
Take care and Happy Reading!!

hmmmmm I'll have to see if I can fix that.


I think she realized that telling the truth wasn't important for happiness-- especially if it would come at the cost of her loved ones' happiness. Sometimes you hope that people will be happy just because you've found happiness, but often times that's not the case. Especially when it ruins someone's image or perception of you. Cora knew telling her truth would bring sadness and harm to those she loved. I don't think she needed to tell her truth to be happy. She lived a full life and felt lucky to be able to create her own definition of happiness so "late" in her life.
I was proud of Cora throughout the book. It seemed that her journey to New York gave her the independence and time alone she needed to find who she was, and what she needed to be happy. She had such a change in her ideals, and realized that life isn't so black and white. I love that she became more progressive and became an advocate for a cause.


Hope your club enjoys the book. Let us know how the discussions go.


I first read it as a book club pick, first heard of Louise, got a dvd about her. I've noted in the past that the child is often blamed for the sins of the elders. As if we forget that the child has no idea what is going on. In my case I was told "nothing really happened, so forget it." Your whole view of life has been skewed, but just forget it. Right.


Get a dvd about Louise, the real Louise. Interesting lady. As for Cora, consider that for hundreds of years people had to live false liveds just to get along. Example: King James I of England and Bible fame was gay. He had a secret tunnel built between his bedroom and his lover's. Tell the truth in that age? NO WAY!

In the end Cora realized life isn't black and white but shades of grey. Within the context and confines of her era, she fought to mold her life into one that would make her happy.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic