“The public cares little about science, except insofar as its conclusions can be made to intervene in behalf of some moral, religious or social controversy.”
― Why Trust Science?
― Why Trust Science?
“statistics, like any tool, don’t work well in all cases and conditions and like any tool can be used well or badly”
― Why Trust Science?
― Why Trust Science?
“In normal times all of us know, whether consciously or not, that there is no love which can't be bettered; nevertheless, we reconcile ourselves more or less easily to the fact that ours has never risen above the average.”
―
―
“How are we to evaluate the truth claims of science when we know that these claims may in the future be overturned? Elsewhere I have called this problem the instability of scientific truth.16 In the 1980s, philosopher Larry Laudan called it the pessimistic meta-induction of the history of science.17 He observed (as have many others) that the history of science offers many examples of scientific “truths” that were later viewed as misconceptions”
― Why Trust Science?
― Why Trust Science?
“Outside their domains of expertise, scientists may be no more well informed than ordinary people. Indeed, they may be less so as their intense training in one area can lead them to be undereducated in others.”
― Why Trust Science?
― Why Trust Science?
Brian Earp’s 2025 Year in Books
Take a look at Brian Earp’s Year in Books, including some fun facts about their reading.
More friends…
Polls voted on by Brian Earp
Lists liked by Brian Earp












