“There’s little need to invest in the comprehensive instrumentation of the urban fabric with sensors, device controllers or informational displays when people themselves are already equipped with something that can act in all of these roles.”
― Against the smart city
― Against the smart city
“As theoretical physicist Max Planck (1858–1947) noted, “A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.”
―
―
“Wider lanes were, obviously, safer than narrower ones. Only they’re not. This time, the problem with the cost-benefit equation wasn’t a faulty premise, but the data itself. In order to test the wider-lanes-are-safer-lanes hypothesis, I studied every crash that occurred on the bridge over a three-year period and marked each one on a map. If that notion had been true, I reasoned, more crashes would have occurred where the lanes were narrowest, that is, at the towers. Just the opposite turned out to be the case. The towers, it turned out, were the safest places on the entire bridge; my explanation is that when lanes get very narrow motorists drive more carefully. Even though every traffic engineer in the country had been taught the gospel of wider lanes, the opposite appeared to be true: “grossly substandard lanes seemed to be the safest of all.” This was the traffic engineering equivalent of saying the Earth was round when the masses knew it was flat. Still, most engineers do not accept this fact.”
― Street Smart: The Rise of Cities and the Fall of Cars
― Street Smart: The Rise of Cities and the Fall of Cars
“quoting John Howard from MIT, “It does not belittle them to say that, just as war is too important to be left to the generals, so highways are too important to leave to the highway engineers.”
― Street Smart: The Rise of Cities and the Fall of Cars
― Street Smart: The Rise of Cities and the Fall of Cars
“the worldviews of two scholars, Thomas Robert Malthus and Adam Smith, both of whom wrote in the late 1700s. Thomas Robert Malthus (1766–1834), English cleric and economist who wrote An Essay on the Principle of Population in 1798. Malthus argued that the growing population would overwhelm the world, leading to widespread famine. Smith argued that businessmen could adapt and innovate rapidly enough that productivity could increase faster than consumption. Where Malthus saw disaster, Smith saw opportunity. While over time there have been eruptions of famine and shortage in different parts of the world, Smith was right.”
― Resource Revolution: How to Capture the Biggest Business Opportunity in a Century
― Resource Revolution: How to Capture the Biggest Business Opportunity in a Century
Global Changes & Challenges
— 70 members
— last activity Jun 19, 2022 01:10AM
What's going on in the world? why so many crises and problems? why so much inequality? what are the solutions? Is there any alternatives to current wo ...more
Piotr’s 2024 Year in Books
Take a look at Piotr’s Year in Books, including some fun facts about their reading.
More friends…
Favorite Genres
Non-fiction and Science
Polls voted on by Piotr
Lists liked by Piotr

























