Jonathan Blanks

Add friend
Sign in to Goodreads to learn more about Jonathan.

http://www.jonathanblanks.com
https://www.goodreads.com/jpblanks

The Rise and Fall...
Rate this book
Clear rating

 
Inferno: The Worl...
Rate this book
Clear rating

 
Mort
Rate this book
Clear rating

progress: 
 
  (9%)
Sep 22, 2021 10:01PM

 
See all 8 books that Jonathan is reading…
Book cover for Mindf*ck: Cambridge Analytica and the Plot to Break America
Whenever I was doing focus groups, people tended to talk about how they grew up, what they do, their families, what music they like, their pet peeves, and their personality—the kinds of things you talk about on a first date. Can you imagine ...more
Loading...
Hannah Arendt
“Thus, long before the outbreak of the war the police in a number of Western countries, under the pretext of “national security,” had on their own initiative established close connections with the Gestapo and the GPU, so that one might say there existed an independent foreign policy of the police. This police-directed foreign policy functioned quite independently of the official governments; the relations between the Gestapo and the French police were never more cordial than at the time of Leon Blum’s popular-front government, which was guided by a decidedly anti-German policy. Contrary to the governments, the various police organizations were never overburdened with “prejudices” against any totalitarian regime; the information and denunciations received from GPU agents were just as welcome to them as those from Fascist or Gestapo agents. They knew about the eminent role of the police apparatus in all totalitarian regimes, they knew about its elevated social status and political importance, and they never bothered to conceal their sympathies. That the Nazis eventually met with so disgracefully little resistance from the police in the countries they occupied, and that they were able to organize terror as much as they did with the assistance of these local police forces, was due at least in part to the powerful position which the police had achieved over the years in their unrestricted and arbitrary domination of stateless and refugees.”
Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism

“By 1870, roughly 284,000 blacks accounted for 12 percent of the population of sixteen Western states and territories. But Negroes actually show up as early as 1790, in a Spanish census, where roughly 20 percent of the populations of San Francisco, San Jose, Santa Barbara, and Monterey acknowledged African ancestry. Until the United States’ conquest of the Mexican territory, about 15 percent of Californians continued to acknowledge African heritage. But with the coming of US rule, the incentive to deny Negro blood resulted in the large-scale “disappearance” of that population. These largely mixed-race people were still there, of course. But now they had stronger reasons to disclaim their African roots.”
Nicholas Johnson, Negroes and the Gun: The Black Tradition of Arms

“Do people believe that police in their city and neighborhood treat individual whites and minorities differently? Most blacks and Hispanics believe that police in their city treat blacks worse than whites; three-quarters of blacks and just over half of Hispanics take this view. Roughly the same percentages think that police treat Hispanics worse than whites. Whites tend to take the opposite view: Three-quarters of whites, for instance, believe that police in their city treat whites the same as the two minority groups.”
Ronald Weitzer, Race and Policing in America: Conflict and Reform

Hannah Arendt
“The effectiveness of this kind of propaganda demonstrates one of the chief characteristics of modern masses. They do not believe in anything visible, in the reality of their own experience; they do not trust their eyes and ears but only their imaginations, which may be caught by anything that is at once universal and consistent in itself. What convinces masses are not facts, and not even invented facts, but only the consistency of the system of which they are presumably part.”
Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism

Hannah Arendt
“A mixture of gullibility and cynicism had been an outstanding characteristic of mob mentality before it became an everyday phenomenon of masses. In an ever-changing, incomprehensible world the masses had reached the point where they would, at the same time, believe everything and nothing, think that everything was possible and that nothing was true. The mixture in itself was remarkable enough, because it spelled the end of the illusion that gullibility was a weakness of unsuspecting primitive souls and cynicism the vice of superior and refined minds. Mass propaganda discovered that its audience was ready at all times to believe the worst, no matter how absurd, and did not particularly object to being deceived because it held every statement to be a lie anyhow. The totalitarian mass leaders based their propaganda on the correct psychological assumption that, under such conditions, one could make people believe the most fantastic statements one day, and trust that if the next day they were given irrefutable proof of their falsehood, they would take refuge in cynicism; instead of deserting the leaders who had lied to them, they would protest that they had known all along that the statement was a lie and would admire the leaders for their superior tactical cleverness.”
Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism

year in books
Sean Ro...
1,572 books | 426 friends

Ryan
1,973 books | 141 friends

Matt Fay
835 books | 94 friends

Soumya ...
829 books | 68 friends

Sayde S...
1,001 books | 57 friends

Matt Ke...
96 books | 299 friends

Seth D ...
883 books | 369 friends

Brian
14 books | 13 friends

More friends…


Polls voted on by Jonathan

Lists liked by Jonathan