282 ratings (4.81 avg)
275 reviews

Phillip Taylor

Add friend

Phillip Taylor’s favorite books

Benjamin's Sale of Goods by Judah Philip Benjamin

Benjamin's Sale of Goods by Anthony Gordon Guest

Stroud's Judicial Dictionary of Words and Phrases by Daniel Greenberg

Principles of Medical Law by Ian Kennedy

Understanding Jurisprudence by Raymond Wacks

A History of the Ho Chi Minh Trail by Virginia B. Morris

More…

Phillip Taylor’s Bookshelves

to-read‎ (2)

currently-reading‎ (2)

read‎ (279)

Stats | More…

Phillip Taylor is Currently Reading

Phillip Taylor rated a book it was amazing

Guidelines for the Assessment of General Damages in Personal Injury Cases (Judicial College Guidelines for the Assessment of General Damages in Personal Injury Cases)

by Judicial Studies Board

bookshelves: currently-reading

Reading for the 17th time

Rate this book

Clear rating

1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars

Phillip Taylor said: " THE PI BIBLE FROM AND FOR THE JUDGES

A review by Phillip Taylor MBE, Barrister-at-Law, Richmond Green Chambers

This work first appeared in 1992, and at that time, Lord Donaldson wrote that there could be no doubt about the practical value of this volum THE PI BIBLE FROM AND FOR THE JUDGES

A review by Phillip Taylor MBE, Barrister-at-Law, Richmond Green Chambers

This work first appeared in 1992, and at that time, Lord Donaldson wrote that there could be no doubt about the practical value of this volume. Since then, the work has become essential for practitioners and now I would not dream of advising on a personal injury matter without referring to the JSB Guidelines first.
The guidelines are always well received, and they have a clear and well received influence on the judiciary. Colin Mackay explains the current need for the work as a record of the levels of awards and settlements which we use as a starting point for our advocacy.

Updates are always difficult but I believe Mackay J and his team have produced the level of consistency needed for the making of awards which served the interests of justice as well as any person can. Lord Justice Waller, in his Foreword, welcomes the work and highlights the comments from the book’s readers together with all the different areas where reports are to be found which makes the working party’s job so difficult.

This is not, however, a ‘ready reckoner’ but, as Mackay says, it distils the conventional wisdom contained in the reported cases, and supplements it from the collective experience of his working party, presenting the result in a convenient, logical and coherent form.

The work is now widely adopted as the starting point in negotiating levels of payment for general damages in personal injury cases. Contents cover the following: Injuries Involving Paralysis; Head Injuries; Psychiatric Damage; Injuries Affecting the Senses; Injuries to Internal Organs; Orthopaedic Injuries; Facial Injuries; Scarring to Other Parts of the Body; Damage to Hair; Dermatitis and a useful index.

The publishers send copies of these guidelines to all hearing PI cases, and it is an indispensible tool for all legal professionals involved in PI litigation, from lawyers to insurance companies, trades unions and medical defence organisations.

Today, I cannot be without my copy of the JSB guidelines, and I know the clients appreciate the wisdom they give! ...more "

Nov 22, 2008 10:30AM · see review

Phillip Taylor rated a book it was amazing

Pleading Guilty

by Paul Genney

bookshelves: currently-reading

Reading for the 4th time

read in November 2008

Rate this book

Clear rating

1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars

Phillip Taylor said: " NOT SUCH A RIGHT WALLY AFTER ALL!

Paul Genney weaves a good tale with this patchwork legal quilt of ‘fly on the wall’ vignettes linked to his character, ‘Wally’ Wallace of Whitebait Chambers, up north. I met Paul recently and he outlined his book, whi NOT SUCH A RIGHT WALLY AFTER ALL!

Paul Genney weaves a good tale with this patchwork legal quilt of ‘fly on the wall’ vignettes linked to his character, ‘Wally’ Wallace of Whitebait Chambers, up north. I met Paul recently and he outlined his book, which took my attention so I read it with interest after the defining Mortimer years with Rumpole and Sir John’s concerns over ‘New’ Labour changes to our profession which seem to have set the current precedent in modern legal characters after Henry Cecil’s Roger Thursby in the Fifties, which was controversial enough in its time.

Most practising barristers will identify very quickly with the issues confronting our flawed hero, Henry Wallace. I’m not giving the plot away, but let me just say that Genney falls nicely into the Somerset Maugham concept of the novel which should end with a death or a marriage, or so Willie said in his most esoteric work ‘The Razor’s Edge’ (which didn’t). Read ‘Pleading Guilty’ and you will see the nice twists as they develop.

It is a book for today with the nice, under-done boot kicking softly at the legal establishment, born more out of a frustration with the system which we all feel from time to time. This snapshot of legal life has the statutory four letter words -a bit too many, but probably at the publishers’ insistence if modern success in getting published is anything to go by. Some was rather unnecessary as most of these words are normally ‘quotes in court’ and not that often heard in the robbing rooms (as we are a bit busy).

I came away at the end, as I sometimes do at the end of a case, feeling for the loneliness of the advocate - many of us been there with Wallace and the dead client, and some of the more fundamental incidents of life which most portraits of barristers just seem to have to include: adultery and personal life, dealing with death, and quirky clients of one description or another. But that’s what we do.

Don’t get me wrong, I found this book hard to put down when I started it, so I became curious and had a bet with myself as to how Genney would structure and flow his 43 chapters. He has clearly borrowed some of his old briefs and witness statements (just to refresh his memory, of course) but the result works as his ingredients mix well with the office relationships and the great names he comes up with- I liked, especially, Horace Pickles, or should that be James Rumpole! Yes, I know who you mean. Readers should look at chapters 23 and 27 which I found particularly moving and I am sure many legal professionals can identify with much of Genney’s understated views.

This is a great new contribution to modern chambers fiction, and if he comes up with a sequel, let’s have less of the bad language, more character description but keep your concept of two legal twists at the end. And please keep the jokes running, especially if they are at the expense of New Labour and certain London chambers. Well done, Paul. We can’t give you the ‘detective writers’ dagger’, but I will happily give you the ‘chambers’ writers gavel’ from the departed Rumpole, as Henry (‘Harry’) has now joined the legal fiction club for the twenty-first century, and let’s hear more from him and your provincial Bar. ...more "

Nov 17, 2008 02:34PM · see review