to-read
(1042)
currently-reading (13)
read (599)
maybe-tr (570)
subject-math (457)
main-to-read (402)
subject-physics (360)
main-read (293)
fiction (270)
currently-reading (13)
read (599)
maybe-tr (570)
subject-math (457)
main-to-read (402)
subject-physics (360)
main-read (293)
fiction (270)
subject-cogsci
(163)
subject-philosophy (141)
subject-society (140)
subject-biology (121)
subject-systems (82)
subject-compsci (76)
subject-personal (69)
hard-copy (66)
read-in-2016 (50)
subject-philosophy (141)
subject-society (140)
subject-biology (121)
subject-systems (82)
subject-compsci (76)
subject-personal (69)
hard-copy (66)
read-in-2016 (50)
“If you always put limits on everything you do, physical or anything else, it will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them.”
―
―
“Nobody tells this to people who are beginners, I wish someone told me. All of us who do creative work, we get into it because we have good taste. But there is this gap. For the first couple years you make stuff, it’s just not that good. It’s trying to be good, it has potential, but it’s not. But your taste, the thing that got you into the game, is still killer. And your taste is why your work disappoints you. A lot of people never get past this phase, they quit. Most people I know who do interesting, creative work went through years of this. We know our work doesn’t have this special thing that we want it to have. We all go through this. And if you are just starting out or you are still in this phase, you gotta know its normal and the most important thing you can do is do a lot of work. Put yourself on a deadline so that every week you will finish one story. It is only by going through a volume of work that you will close that gap, and your work will be as good as your ambitions. And I took longer to figure out how to do this than anyone I’ve ever met. It’s gonna take awhile. It’s normal to take awhile. You’ve just gotta fight your way through.”
―
―
“...the following parable may be useful. Long ago, when shepherds wanted to see if two herds of sheep were isomorphic, they would look for an explicit isomorphism. In other words, they would line up both herds and try to match each sheep in one herd with a sheep in the other. But one day, along came a shepherd who invented decategorification. She realized one could take each herd and ‘count’ it, setting up an isomorphism between it and some set of ‘numbers’, which were nonsense words like ‘one, two, three, . . . ’ specially designed for this purpose. By comparing the resulting numbers, she could show that two herds were isomorphic without explicitly establishing an isomorphism! In short, by decategorifying the category of finite sets, the set of natural numbers was invented. According to this parable, decategorification started out as a stroke of mathematical genius. Only later did it become a matter of dumb habit, which we are now struggling to overcome by means of categorification.”
―
―
“There is no such thing as philosophy-free science; there is only science whose philosophical baggage is taken on board without examination.
—Daniel Dennett, Darwin's Dangerous Idea, 1995”
― Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life
—Daniel Dennett, Darwin's Dangerous Idea, 1995”
― Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life
Mark’s 2025 Year in Books
Take a look at Mark’s Year in Books, including some fun facts about their reading.
More friends…
Favorite Genres
Polls voted on by Mark
Lists liked by Mark



















































