Michael Histand

Add friend
Sign in to Goodreads to learn more about Michael.


On Liberty
Michael Histand is currently reading
bookshelves: currently-reading
Rate this book
Clear rating

 
The Aeneid
Michael Histand is currently reading
by Virgil
bookshelves: currently-reading
Rate this book
Clear rating

 
Book cover for An Enemy of the People
You have an ingrained tendency to take your own way, at all events; and that is almost equally inadmissible in a well-ordered community. The individual ought undoubtedly to acquiesce in subordinating himself to the community—or, to speak ...more
Loading...
“The Constitution guaranteed a republican form of government to the states—but didn’t its protections for slavery undermine republican government as well? The security for the slave trade in Article I, Section 9, he wrote, went against what other states had already done to purify themselves of slavery’s corruption, and “is especially scandalous and inconsistant in a people, who have asserted their own liberty by the sword, and which dangerously enfeebles the districts, wherein the laborers are bondsmen. The words are dark and ambiguous; such as no plain man of common sense would have used, [and] are evidently chosen to conceal from Europe, that in this enlightened country, the practice of slavery has its advocates among men in the highest stations.” The Constitution partook of propaganda. The corollary: don’t trust men in the highest stations.”
David Waldstreicher, Slavery's Constitution: From Revolution to Ratification

“States with slaves had more votes in the Congress than states without them, making the three-fifths clause reason enough to reject the document.”
David Waldstreicher, Slavery's Constitution: From Revolution to Ratification

“To give more power to Southerners was to hand the federal government over to the least egalitarian people in the United States.13”
David Waldstreicher, Slavery's Constitution: From Revolution to Ratification

“It had been said, “It is not we doing it.” To the contrary, insisted these quintessential provincials, “We are the nation” who will have to defend slaveholders when “Africans rise up” and a foreign power intervenes on their side. Why wasn’t the prohibition of the slave trade by the Continental Congress in 1774 an ironclad precedent? “Can we suppose what was morally evil in the year 1774, has become in the year 1788, morally good?” Perhaps tired of reading about people like themselves as living proof of the need for better leadership, the dissenters turned their antifederalist antislavery into a blast against the founders themselves.”
David Waldstreicher, Slavery's Constitution: From Revolution to Ratification

“Why wasn’t the prohibition of the slave trade by the Continental Congress in 1774 an ironclad precedent? “Can we suppose what was morally evil in the year 1774, has become in the year 1788, morally good?” Perhaps tired of reading about people like themselves as living proof of the need for better leadership, the dissenters turned their antifederalist antislavery into a blast against the founders themselves.”
David Waldstreicher, Slavery's Constitution: From Revolution to Ratification

220 Goodreads Librarians Group — 311469 members — last activity 0 minutes ago
Goodreads Librarians are volunteers who help ensure the accuracy of information about books and authors in the Goodreads' catalog. The Goodreads Libra ...more
year in books
Rayna B...
495 books | 585 friends

Rosemarie
7,828 books | 1,024 friends

eva ₊˚⊹♡
730 books | 47 friends





Polls voted on by Michael

Lists liked by Michael