to-read
(464)
currently-reading (0)
read (641)
religion-theology (174)
brittania (146)
philosophy (132)
poetry (128)
psychology (81)
esoteric (77)
western-canon (76)
xtianity (75)
currently-reading (0)
read (641)
religion-theology (174)
brittania (146)
philosophy (132)
poetry (128)
psychology (81)
esoteric (77)
western-canon (76)
xtianity (75)
german-austrian
(68)
19th-cen (65)
drama (64)
history (63)
francophilia (54)
favorites (53)
bio-memoir (47)
lit-crit (47)
language-and-linguistics (46)
langue-de-molière (44)
prose-palace (42)
19th-cen (65)
drama (64)
history (63)
francophilia (54)
favorites (53)
bio-memoir (47)
lit-crit (47)
language-and-linguistics (46)
langue-de-molière (44)
prose-palace (42)
“Thus the sons of earth now drink in
The fire of heaven without danger.
And it is our duty, poets, to stand
Bare-headed under the storms of God,
Grasping with our own hand
The Father's beam itself,
And to offer the gift of heaven,
Wrapped in song, to the people.
From “As On a Holiday” (“Wie Wenn am Feiertage”)”
―
The fire of heaven without danger.
And it is our duty, poets, to stand
Bare-headed under the storms of God,
Grasping with our own hand
The Father's beam itself,
And to offer the gift of heaven,
Wrapped in song, to the people.
From “As On a Holiday” (“Wie Wenn am Feiertage”)”
―
“Man is nothing without an object. The great models of humanity, such men as reveal to us what man is capable of, have attested the truth of this proposition by their lives. They had only one dominant passion—the realisation of the aim which was the essential object of their activity. But the object to which a subject essentially, necessarily relates, is nothing else than this subject’s own, but objective, nature. If it be an object common to several individuals of the same species, but under various conditions, it is still, at least as to the form under which it presents itself to each of them according to their respective modifications, their own, but objective, nature. Thus the Sun is the common object of the planets, but it is an object to Mercury, to Venus, to Saturn, to Uranus, under other conditions than to the Earth. Each planet has its own sun. The Sun which lights and warms Uranus has no physical (only an astronomical, scientific) existence for the Earth; and not only does the Sun appear different, but it really is another sun on Uranus than on the Earth. The relation of the Sun to the Earth is therefore at the same time a relation of the Earth to itself, or to its own nature, for the measure of the size and of the intensity of light which the Sun possesses as the object of the Earth is the measure of the distance which determines the peculiar nature of the Earth. Hence each planet has in its sun the mirror of its own nature.”
―
―
“This vicious circle is but the first of a series in which the mind that studies itself gets lost in a giddy whirling. The very simplicity of these paradoxes makes them irreducible. Whatever may be the plays on words and the acrobatics of logic, to understand is, above all, to unify. The mind’s deepest desire, even in its most elaborate operations, parallels man’s unconscious feeling in the face of his universe: it is an insistence upon familiarity, an appetite for clarity. Understanding the world for a man is reducing it to the human, stamping it with his seal. The cat’s universe is not the universe of the anthill. The truism “All thought is anthropomorphic” has no other meaning. Likewise, the mind that aims to understand reality can consider itself satisfied only by reducing it to terms of thought. If man realized that the universe like him can love and suffer, he would be reconciled. If thought discovered in the shimmering mirrors of phenomena eternal relations capable of summing them up and summing themselves up in a single principle, then would be seen an intellectual joy of which the myth of the blessed would be but a ridiculous imitation. That nostalgia for unity, that appetite for the absolute illustrates the essential impulse of the human drama. But the fact of that nostalgia’s existence does not imply that it is to be immediately satisfied. For if, bridging the gulf that separates desire from conquest, we assert with Parmenides the reality of the One (whatever it may be), we fall into the ridiculous contradiction of a mind that asserts total unity and proves by its very assertion its own difference and the diversity it claimed to resolve. This other vicious circle is enough to stifle our hopes”
―
―
Mathematics Students
— 568 members
— last activity Aug 11, 2022 03:15AM
This group is for people interested in mathematics at the college level. All are welcome. Professor and students never stop learning mathematics, henc ...more
Abhishek’s 2024 Year in Books
Take a look at Abhishek’s Year in Books, including some fun facts about their reading.
More friends…
Favorite Genres
Polls voted on by Abhishek
Lists liked by Abhishek






































