
“Or as Esping-Andersen (1996a: 3) put it eloquently already more than 15 years ago: The advanced Western nations’ welfare states were built to cater to an economy dominated by industrial mass production. In the era of the “Keynesian consensus” there was no perceived trade-off between social security and economic growth, between equality and efficiency. This consensus has disappeared because the underlying assumptions no longer obtain. Non-inflationary demand-led growth within one country appears impossible; full employment today must be attained via services, given industrial decline; the conventional male breadwinner family is eroding, fertility is falling, and the life course is increasingly non-standard.”
― Comparative Welfare State Politics
― Comparative Welfare State Politics
“Welfare states come in different shapes and sizes; they are constructed on diverging conceptions of social rights and duties; some stress equality and solidarity, others freedom; and the range of policy objectives is vast and widely dissimilar.”
― Comparative Welfare State Politics
― Comparative Welfare State Politics
“intentional policy drift assumes knowledge of policy failure and implies that “policy makers fail to update policies due to pressure from intense minority interests or political actors exploiting veto points in the political process”
― Comparative Welfare State Politics
― Comparative Welfare State Politics
Mirage’s 2024 Year in Books
Take a look at Mirage’s Year in Books, including some fun facts about their reading.
More friends…
Polls voted on by Mirage
Lists liked by Mirage