2,185 books
—
2,066 voters
to-read
(1639)
currently-reading (24)
read (188)
did-not-finish (6)
on-hold (33)
contemporary-philosophy (228)
economics-and-finance (154)
philosophy (147)
critical-theory (137)
history (121)
polisci-law (108)
biographies (102)
currently-reading (24)
read (188)
did-not-finish (6)
on-hold (33)
contemporary-philosophy (228)
economics-and-finance (154)
philosophy (147)
critical-theory (137)
history (121)
polisci-law (108)
biographies (102)
psychology-self-help
(85)
religion-theology (85)
history-ideas (83)
math-and-logic (68)
linguistics-philoflang (66)
man-g-hw-a-comics (64)
novels (60)
natural-science (56)
marxism (49)
history-europe (48)
political-philosophy (42)
race (41)
religion-theology (85)
history-ideas (83)
math-and-logic (68)
linguistics-philoflang (66)
man-g-hw-a-comics (64)
novels (60)
natural-science (56)
marxism (49)
history-europe (48)
political-philosophy (42)
race (41)
“The reciprocal relationship of epistemology and science is of noteworthy kind. They are dependent upon each other. Epistemology without contact with science becomes an empty scheme. Science without epistemology is—insofar as it is thinkable at all—primitive and muddled. However, no sooner has the epistemologist, who is seeking a clear system, fought his way through to such a system, than he is inclined to interpret the thought-content of science in the sense of his system and to reject whatever does not fit into his system. The scientist, however, cannot afford to carry his striving for epistemological systematic that far. He accepts gratefully the epistemological conceptual analysis; but the external conditions, which are set for him by the facts of experience, do not permit him to let himself be too much restricted in the construction of his conceptual world by the adherence to an epistemological system. He therefore must appear to the systematic epistemologist as a type of unscrupulous opportunist: he appears as realist insofar as he seeks to describe a world independent of the acts of perception; as idealist insofar as he looks upon the concepts and theories as free inventions of the human spirit (not logically derivable from what is empirically given); as positivist insofar as he considers his concepts and theories justified only to the extent to which they furnish a logical representation of relations among sensory experiences. He may even appear as Platonist or Pythagorean insofar as he considers the viewpoint of logical simplicity as an indispensable and effective tool of his research. (Einstein 1949, 683–684)”
― Autobiographical Notes
― Autobiographical Notes
“In trying to win over populist supporters, and perhaps even some elites, liberal democrats should avoid both simplistic solutions that pander to “the people” and elitist discourses that dismiss the moral and intellectual competence of ordinary citizens—both will only strengthen the populists. Most importantly, given that populism often asks the right questions but provides the wrong answers, the ultimate goal should be not just the destruction of populist supply, but also the weakening of populist demand. Only the latter will actually strengthen liberal democracy.”
― Populism: A Very Short Introduction
― Populism: A Very Short Introduction
“Meritocracy may seem a very contemporary idea, but, as Raymond Williams argued in a book review in 1958, the ladder is a perfect symbol of the bourgeois idea of society, for, while it undoubtedly offers the opportunity to climb, ‘it is a device that can only be used individually; you go up the ladder alone’. Such an ‘alternative to solidarity’, pointed out Williams, has dazzled many working-class leaders and is objectionable in two respects: firstly, it weakens community and the task of common betterment; and secondly, it ‘sweetens the poison of hierarchy’ by offering advancement through merit rather than money or birth, whilst retaining a commitment to the very notion of hierarchy itself (Williams 1958: 331).”
― Against Meritocracy: Culture, power and myths of mobility
― Against Meritocracy: Culture, power and myths of mobility
“Students of human nature and philosophers have long ago taught us that we do wrong to value our intelligence as an independent force and to overlook its dependence upon our emotional life. According to their view our intellect can work reliably only when it is removed from the influence of powerful incitements; otherwise it acts simply as an instrument at the beck and call of our will and delivers the results which the will demands. Logical argumentation is therefore powerless against affective interests; that is why arguing with reasons which, according to Falstaff, are as common as blackberries, are so fruitless where our interests are concerned. Whenever possible psychoanalytic experience has driven home this assertion. It is in a position to prove every day that the cleverest people suddenly behave as unintelligently as defectives as soon as their understanding encounters emotional resistance, but that they regain their intelligence completely as soon as this resistance has been overcome.”
― Reflections on War and Death
― Reflections on War and Death
“L'instabilité des choses a pour corrélat l'impuissance de l'homme.”
― The Normal and the Pathological
― The Normal and the Pathological
Venezuela lee
— 644 members
— last activity Jun 25, 2025 03:49PM
El venezolano sigue leyendo, a pesar de la dificultad de encontrar libros de autores extranjeros, los costos de los existentes y la pérdida de algunas ...more
International Information Syndicate
— 24 members
— last activity Jan 01, 2019 05:55PM
The Official GoodReads group of the International Information Syndicate, AKA /r/Chomsky and /r/breadtube.
José’s 2025 Year in Books
Take a look at José’s Year in Books, including some fun facts about their reading.
More friends…
Favorite Genres
Polls voted on by José
Lists liked by José


























































