Ivan

“When scientists ask whether they should blog, they are sometimes paralyzed: "Will I be wasting my time? Narcissistically navel-gazing? What might people say?" It is probably healthy to consider these questions when your reputation is on the line. On the other hand, the safest route is rarely a useful path for anyone who wants to make a difference. When it comes to blogging, researchers should balance skepticism with a clear-eyed assessment of the power and possibilities.”
― Nancy Baron, Escape from the Ivory Tower: A Guide to Making Your Science Matter

“One guiding post to determine where the distressing issues, needs and aspirations is Maslow‘s Needs Hierarchy. If you can identify their fears and concerns, you can choose a story that provides hope.”
― Gideon For-mukwai, The Science of Story Selling: How Win the Hearts & Minds of Your Prospects for Profit and Purpose

“Though Americans have tremendous respect for the ability of engineers and scientists to solve important problems and answer important questions, polls indicate many of us worry that technology moves too fast, and that its benefits blind us to important spiritual concerns.”
― Cornelia Dean, Am I Making Myself Clear?: A Scientist's Guide to Talking to the Public

“Truly Be the Voice of Science
If you want to make a major contribution to science communication, you need to know from the outset that it will be a long and personal journey. It won't be easy. It won't be safe. And it's doubtful you'll be able to control the timeline.
No one told Carl Sagan to write science fiction novels, get involved with Hollywood filmmaking, or go on Johnny Carson's Tonight Show. He simply had an inner voice driving him to reach out and share his passion for science. He was the voice of science, by his own doing.”
― Randy Olson, Don't Be Such a Scientist: Talking Substance in an Age of Style