76,111 books
—
282,788 voters
to-read
(422)
currently-reading (2)
read (275)
audiobook (142)
4-plus-multi-book-series (80)
high-fantasy (80)
young-adult (73)
fiction (56)
3-book-trilogies (44)
graphic-novels (44)
1-book-standalone (40)
currently-reading (2)
read (275)
audiobook (142)
4-plus-multi-book-series (80)
high-fantasy (80)
young-adult (73)
fiction (56)
3-book-trilogies (44)
graphic-novels (44)
1-book-standalone (40)
middle-grade
(40)
short-stories (33)
urban-fantasy (33)
reviewed (31)
queer (28)
mythology (25)
science-fiction (25)
bookclub (24)
romantasy (23)
favorites (22)
contemporary-romance (21)
short-stories (33)
urban-fantasy (33)
reviewed (31)
queer (28)
mythology (25)
science-fiction (25)
bookclub (24)
romantasy (23)
favorites (22)
contemporary-romance (21)
“What is a woman's place in this modern world? Jasnah Kholin's words read. I rebel against this question, though so many of my peers ask it. The inherent bias in the inquiry seems invisible to so many of them. They consider themselves progressive because they are willing to challenge many of the assumptions of the past.
They ignore the greater assumption--that a 'place' for women must be defined and set forth to begin with. Half of the population must somehow be reduced to the role arrived at by a single conversation. No matter how broad that role is, it will be--by-nature--a reduction from the infinite variety that is womanhood.
I say that there is no role for women--there is, instead, a role for each woman, and she must make it for herself. For some, it will be the role of scholar; for others, it will be the role of wife. For others, it will be both. For yet others, it will be neither.
Do not mistake me in assuming I value one woman's role above another. My point is not to stratify our society--we have done that far to well already--my point is to diversify our discourse.
A woman's strength should not be in her role, whatever she chooses it to be, but in the power to choose that role. It is amazing to me that I even have to make this point, as I see it as the very foundation of our conversation.”
― Words of Radiance
They ignore the greater assumption--that a 'place' for women must be defined and set forth to begin with. Half of the population must somehow be reduced to the role arrived at by a single conversation. No matter how broad that role is, it will be--by-nature--a reduction from the infinite variety that is womanhood.
I say that there is no role for women--there is, instead, a role for each woman, and she must make it for herself. For some, it will be the role of scholar; for others, it will be the role of wife. For others, it will be both. For yet others, it will be neither.
Do not mistake me in assuming I value one woman's role above another. My point is not to stratify our society--we have done that far to well already--my point is to diversify our discourse.
A woman's strength should not be in her role, whatever she chooses it to be, but in the power to choose that role. It is amazing to me that I even have to make this point, as I see it as the very foundation of our conversation.”
― Words of Radiance
“Any old horse will run when it's whipped, but only fast enough to avoid the whipping," Hilo said. "Racehorses, though, they run because they look at the horse on their left, they look at the one on their right, and they think, No way am I second to these fuckers.”
― Jade City
― Jade City
“You were always so full of hope, so maddeningly tenacious. And then, oh, then, Liska, Liseczka, the worst thing of all happened.’ His voice cracks, and he looks away. ‘I fell in love.”
― Where the Dark Stands Still
― Where the Dark Stands Still
“She thought, Two strong-minded women in a man’s world, if they do not quickly become allies, are destined to be incurable rivals.”
― Jade City
― Jade City
“Do not let your assumptions about a culture block your ability to perceive the individual, or you will fail.”
― Words of Radiance
― Words of Radiance
Beta Reader Group
— 29924 members
— last activity 22 hours, 43 min ago
A place to connect writers with beta readers. Sometimes writers get so involved in the plot they can't see the wood for the trees. Hang on a sec'--th ...more
Jacques’s 2025 Year in Books
Take a look at Jacques’s Year in Books, including some fun facts about their reading.
More friends…
Favorite Genres
Polls voted on by Jacques
Lists liked by Jacques




























