31,546 books
—
120,144 voters
Chetna
https://www.goodreads.com/chet_a
to-read
(1014)
currently-reading (26)
read (224)
ive-seen-the-film (27)
read-in-translation (25)
plays (23)
own (21)
halfway-pending24 (20)
undergrad-thesis-litt-review (16)
nerdfighteria-recommendations (14)
currently-reading (26)
read (224)
ive-seen-the-film (27)
read-in-translation (25)
plays (23)
own (21)
halfway-pending24 (20)
undergrad-thesis-litt-review (16)
nerdfighteria-recommendations (14)
own-wishlist
(13)
political-science-undergrad (9)
noveltea (8)
upskilling (8)
bangtan-recommends (7)
on-cinema (7)
advanced-litt-ihs (6)
dnf (6)
favourites (6)
philosophy-undergrad (6)
political-science-undergrad (9)
noveltea (8)
upskilling (8)
bangtan-recommends (7)
on-cinema (7)
advanced-litt-ihs (6)
dnf (6)
favourites (6)
philosophy-undergrad (6)
“The so-called paradox of freedom is the argument that freedom in the sense of absence of any constraining control must lead to very great restraint, since it makes the bully free to enslave the meek. The idea is, in a slightly different form, and with very different tendency, clearly expressed in Plato.
Less well known is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. — In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.”
― The Open Society and Its Enemies
Less well known is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. — In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.”
― The Open Society and Its Enemies
“I never travel without my diary. One should always have something sensational to read in the train.”
― The Importance of Being Earnest
― The Importance of Being Earnest
“You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant.”
―
―
“Lock up your libraries if you like; but there is no gate, no lock, no bolt that you can set upon the freedom of my mind.”
― A Room of One’s Own
― A Room of One’s Own
Inkshares Community
— 543 members
— last activity Jul 19, 2020 02:37AM
Inkshares writers and readers chat, promote, review, share advice, request feedback, collaborate, and discuss Inkshares news.
Our Shared Shelf
— 223266 members
— last activity Dec 16, 2025 12:22AM
OUR SHARED SHELF IS CURRENTLY DORMANT AND NOT MANAGED BY EMMA AND HER TEAM. Dear Readers, As part of my work with UN Women, I have started reading ...more
Queer Indian Literature
— 32 members
— last activity Mar 02, 2017 12:34PM
This Group is dedicated to Indian/Asian Queer literature. The purpose of this group is to explore the Queer lifestyle, Gender and sexuality issues, Fi ...more
Goodreads Librarians Group
— 305980 members
— last activity 0 minutes ago
Goodreads Librarians are volunteers who help ensure the accuracy of information about books and authors in the Goodreads' catalog. The Goodreads Libra ...more
The Pune Book Readers Club
— 98 members
— last activity Dec 19, 2025 09:48PM
This group is intended to carry forward the efforts put up by the Pune Book Readers Club. Our objective is to meet and discuss literature of your choi ...more
Chetna’s 2025 Year in Books
Take a look at Chetna’s Year in Books, including some fun facts about their reading.
More friends…
Favorite Genres
Polls voted on by Chetna
Lists liked by Chetna


































