L.E. Lacaille

Add friend
Sign in to Goodreads to learn more about L.E..


Cloaks
L.E. Lacaille is currently reading
by F.A. Fisher (Goodreads Author)
bookshelves: currently-reading
Rate this book
Clear rating

 
Loading...
David Berlinski
“Arguments follow from assumptions, and assumptions follow from beliefs, and very rarely—perhaps never—do beliefs reflect an agenda determined entirely by the facts.”
David Berlinski, The Devil's Delusion: Atheism and its Scientific Pretensions

David Berlinski
“Just who has imposed on the suffering human race poison gas, barbed wire, high explosives, experiments in eugenics, the formula for zyklon b, heavy artillery, pseudo-scientific justifications for mass murder, cluster bombs, attack submarines, napalm, intercontinental missiles , military space platforms and nuclear weapons? If memory serves it was not the Vatican.”
David Berlinski, The Devil's Delusion: Atheism and Its Scientific Pretensions

David Berlinski
“The argument that Hawking has offered may be conveyed by question-and-answer, as in the Catholic catechism.   A Catechism of Quantum Cosmology Q: From what did our universe evolve? A: Our universe evolved from a much smaller, much emptier mini-universe. You may think of it as an egg. Q: What was the smaller, emptier universe like? A: It was a four-dimensional sphere with nothing much inside it. You may think of that as weird. Q: How can a sphere have four dimensions? A: A sphere may have four dimensions if it has one more dimension than a three-dimensional sphere. You may think of that as obvious. Q: Does the smaller, emptier universe have a name? A: The smaller, emptier universe is called a de Sitter universe. You may think of that as about time someone paid attention to de Sitter. Q: Is there anything else I should know about the smaller, emptier universe? A: Yes. It represents a solution to Einstein’s field equations. You may think of that as a good thing. Q: Where was that smaller, emptier universe or egg? A: It was in the place where space as we know it did not exist. You may think of it as a sac. Q: When was it there? A: It was there at the time when time as we know it did not exist. You may think of it as a mystery. Q: Where did the egg come from? A: The egg did not actually come from anywhere. You may think of this as astonishing. Q: If the egg did not come from anywhere, how did it get there? A: The egg got there because the wave function of the universe said it was probable. You may think of this as a done deal. Q: How did our universe evolve from the egg? A: It evolved by inflating itself up from its sac to become the universe in which we now find ourselves. You may think of that as just one of those things. This catechism, I should add, is not a parody of quantum cosmology. It is quantum cosmology.”
David Berlinski, The Devil's Delusion: Atheism and its Scientific Pretensions

David Berlinski
“Perhaps the best argument in favor of the thesis that the Big Bang supports theism,” the astrophysicist Christopher Isham has observed, “is the obvious unease with which it is greeted by some atheist physicists.”
David Berlinski, The Devil's Delusion: Atheism and its Scientific Pretensions

David Berlinski
“Has anyone provided proof of God’s inexistence? Not even close. Has quantum cosmology explained the emergence of the universe or why it is here? Not even close. Have our sciences explained why our universe seems to be fine-tuned to allow for the existence of life? Not even close. Are physicists and biologists willing to believe in anything so long as it is not religious thought? Close enough. Has rationalism and moral thought provided us with an understanding of what is good, what is right, and what is moral? Not close enough. Has secularism in the terrible 20th century been a force for good? Not even close, to being close. Is there a narrow and oppressive orthodoxy in the sciences? Close enough. Does anything in the sciences or their philosophy justify the claim that religious belief is irrational? Not even in the ball park. Is scientific atheism a frivolous exercise in intellectual contempt? Dead on.”
David Berlinski, The Devil's Delusion: Atheism and Its Scientific Pretensions

31471 THE Group for Authors! — 13040 members — last activity Jun 01, 2026 05:32PM
This is a group for authors to discuss their craft, as well as publishing and book marketing.
year in books
Faber B...
156 books | 2,607 friends

Jane Lo...
335 books | 29 friends

Hannah
215 books | 18 friends

Shinry ...
165 books | 735 friends

Hodder ...
272 books | 2,286 friends

Helen J...
6 books | 20 friends

Patti C...
1 book | 33 friends

RL Adare
11 books | 417 friends

More friends…



Polls voted on by L.E.

Lists liked by L.E.