to-read
(561)
currently-reading (5)
read (452)
religion (214)
the-library (145)
the-school (45)
favorites (15)
currently-reading (5)
read (452)
religion (214)
the-library (145)
the-school (45)
favorites (15)
greco-roman
(125)
history (112)
philosophy-politics (88)
course-guidebooks (74)
christianity (40)
japan (37)
china (36)
history (112)
philosophy-politics (88)
course-guidebooks (74)
christianity (40)
japan (37)
china (36)
“This theory of beauty is not developed with respect to artefacts alone, but universally. It is independent of taste, for it is recognized that as Augustine says, there are those who take pleasure in deformities. The word deformity is significant here, because it is precisely a formal beauty that is in question; and we must not forget that "formal" includes the connotation "formative." The recognition of beauty depends on judgment, not on sensation; the beauty of the æsthetic surfaces depending on their information, and not upon themselves, Everything, whether natural or artificial, is beautiful to the extent that it really is what it purports to be, and independently of all comparisons; or ugly to the extent that its own form is not expressed and realized in its tangible actuality. The work of art is beautiful, accordingly, in terms of perfection, or truth and aptitude as defined above; whatever is inept or vague cannot be considered beautiful, however it may be valued by those who "know what they like.”
― Christian & Oriental Philosophy of Art Formerly: "Why Exhibit Works of Art?"
― Christian & Oriental Philosophy of Art Formerly: "Why Exhibit Works of Art?"
“The purpose of art is then to reveal a beauty
that we like or can be taught to like; the purpose of art is to give pleasure; the work of art as the source of pleasure is its own end; art is for art's sake.
We value the work for the pleasure to be derived from the sight, sound, or touch of its aesthetic surfaces; our conception of beauty is literally skin-deep; questions of utility and intelligibility rarely arise, and if they arise are dismissed as irrelevant.”
― Christian & Oriental Philosophy of Art Formerly: "Why Exhibit Works of Art?"
that we like or can be taught to like; the purpose of art is to give pleasure; the work of art as the source of pleasure is its own end; art is for art's sake.
We value the work for the pleasure to be derived from the sight, sound, or touch of its aesthetic surfaces; our conception of beauty is literally skin-deep; questions of utility and intelligibility rarely arise, and if they arise are dismissed as irrelevant.”
― Christian & Oriental Philosophy of Art Formerly: "Why Exhibit Works of Art?"
“Artists are the priests of every new church; for it is essentially their consciousness that perceives intuitively the unity of all life, which forms the sole test and sanction of all new moralities, the one and only path from selfishness to brotherhood.”
―
―
“We have shown that art is essentially symbolic, and only accidentally illustrative or historical ; and finally that art, even the highest, is only the means to an end, that even the scriptural art is only a manner of "seeing through a glass, darkly," and that although this is far better than not to see at all, the utility of iconography must come to an end when vision is "face to face.”
― Christian & Oriental Philosophy of Art Formerly: "Why Exhibit Works of Art?"
― Christian & Oriental Philosophy of Art Formerly: "Why Exhibit Works of Art?"
Goodreads Librarians Group
— 315110 members
— last activity 17 minutes ago
Goodreads Librarians are volunteers who help ensure the accuracy of information about books and authors in the Goodreads' catalog. The Goodreads Libra ...more
Brett’s 2025 Year in Books
Take a look at Brett’s Year in Books, including some fun facts about their reading.
More friends…
Favorite Genres
Polls voted on by Brett
Lists liked by Brett






















































