Stuart

Add friend
Sign in to Goodreads to learn more about Stuart.


Philosophy in a N...
Rate this book
Clear rating

 
The Skeptic's Ann...
Stuart is currently reading
by Steve Wells (Goodreads Author)
Rate this book
Clear rating

progress: 
 
  (2%)
Aug 16, 2024 10:35AM

 
The World: A Fami...
Stuart is currently reading
by Simon Sebag Montefiore (Goodreads Author)
bookshelves: currently-reading, history
Rate this book
Clear rating

progress: 
 
  (17%)
Dec 31, 2025 05:18PM

 
Loading...
D.W. Buffa
“Parmenides was then quite old, but his mind was still powerful and clear. The question was what is, what can be, how does anything come into being? And Parmenides gave a very strange answer: Nothing can come into being; only unchangeable being is. But all the accounts given by the poets, Homer and Hesiod and the others, tell how the gods were created; and we know from these and other writings that every city has its own gods. Parmenides says that the gods having come into being cannot be. He replaces the gods by the unchangeable being. There cannot be a beginning, a genesis, because coming into being means a movement from nothing to being and nothing is not. What is there if the gods do not exist? – Intelligible principles. One of them is Eros, which Parmenides called the first and oldest of all the gods.” I thought I understood, but I was not sure; and let me confess that I was so much in awe of him that my usual selfconfidence, what some no doubt thought my arrogance, had all but vanished and left me a stammering, tonguetied fool. And he knew it, knew it probably before I did; knew it as easily, as completely, as I knew how to breathe. “If the gods have not come into being,” he said, “how then can anything, even these intelligible principles, come into being? They must, like the world itself, be eternal. But then, you wonder, is it possible for Parmenides, for anyone, to say that one of these principles, Eros, is the first and oldest.”
D. W. Buffa, Helen

Edward O. Wilson
“With more and more decision making and work done by robots, what will be left for humans to do? Do we really want to compete biologically with robot technology by using brain implants and genetically improved intelligence and social behavior? This choice would mean a sharp departure away from the human nature we have inherited, and a fundamental change in the human condition. Now we are talking about a problem best solved within the humanities, and one more reason the humanities are all-important. While I’m at it, I hereby cast a vote for existential conservatism, the preservation of biological human nature as a sacred trust. We are doing very well in science and technology. Let’s agree to keep it up, and move both along even faster. But let’s also promote the humanities, that which makes us human, and not use science to mess around with the wellspring of this, the absolute and unique potential of the human future.”
Edward O. Wilson, The Meaning of Human Existence

Philip Glass
“The music that I was playing and writing in those early years, that I was importing to Europe, was quintessentially New York music in a way that I always hoped it would be. I wanted my concert music to be as distinctive as Zappa at the Fillmore East, and I think I ended up doing that.”
Philip Glass, Words Without Music: A Memoir

Sarah Vowell
“The newly dubbed General Lafayette was only nineteen years old. Considering Independence Hall was also where the founders calculated that a slave equals three-fifths of a person and cooked up an electoral college that lets Florida and Ohio pick our presidents, making an adolescent who barely spoke English a major general at the age I got hired to run the cash register at a Portland pizza joint was not the worst decision ever made there.”
Sarah Vowell, Lafayette in the Somewhat United States

Edward O. Wilson
“The Founding Fathers of the United States understood the risk of tribal religious conflict very well. George Washington observed, “Of all the animosities which have existed among mankind those which are caused by difference of sentiments in religion appear to be the most inveterate and distressing and ought most to be deprecated.” James Madison agreed, noting the “torrents of blood” that result from religious competition. John Adams insisted that “the government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion.” America has slipped a bit since then.”
Edward O. Wilson, The Meaning of Human Existence

year in books
Patrick...
405 books | 41 friends

Maggie
456 books | 123 friends

KMO
KMO
220 books | 458 friends

Melissa
978 books | 87 friends

Dawnell...
2,326 books | 153 friends

Onsetsu...
1,170 books | 414 friends

Todd
266 books | 30 friends

Leslie
1,073 books | 95 friends

More friends…


Polls voted on by Stuart

Lists liked by Stuart