“The first thing to emphasize is that ‘the origin of social inequality’ is not a problem which would have made sense to anyone in the Middle Ages. Ranks and hierarchies were assumed to have existed from the very beginning. Even in the Garden of Eden, as the thirteenth-century philosopher Thomas Aquinas observed, Adam clearly outranked Eve. ‘Social equality’ – and therefore, its opposite, inequality – simply did not exist as a concept. A recent survey of medieval literature by two Italian scholars in fact finds no evidence that the Latin terms aequalitas or inaequalitas or their English, French, Spanish, German and Italian cognates were used to describe social relations at all before the time of Columbus. So one cannot even say that medieval thinkers rejected the notion of social equality: the idea that it might exist seems never to have occurred to them.6”
― The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity
― The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity
“The legal and philosophical question then became: what rights do human beings have simply by dint of being human – that is, what rights could they be said to have ‘naturally’, even if they existed in a State of Nature, innocent of the teachings of written philosophy and revealed religion, and without codified laws?”
― The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity
― The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity
“What social forms would still exist, even among people who had no recognizable form of law or government? Would marriage exist? What forms might it take? Would Natural Man tend to be naturally gregarious, or would people tend to avoid one another? Was there such a thing as natural religion?”
― The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity
― The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity
“Europeans were constantly squabbling for advantage; societies of the Northeast Woodlands, by contrast, guaranteed one another the means to an autonomous life – or at least ensured no man or woman was subordinated to any other. Insofar as we can speak of communism, it existed not in opposition to but in support of individual freedom.”
― The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity
― The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity
“Equality here is a direct extension of freedom; indeed, is its expression. It also has almost nothing in common with the more familiar (Eurasian) notion of ‘equality before the law’, which is ultimately equality before the sovereign – that is, once again, equality in common subjugation.”
― The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity
― The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity
Bookworm Bitches
— 12431 members
— last activity 3 minutes ago
This group now has a Discord! https://discord.gg/QC8vCNfzKa I would encourage everyone to join as it will become a primary hub for book-of-the-month d ...more
Chicks On Lit
— 5169 members
— last activity Jun 03, 2026 02:31PM
(Est. Feb 14, 2008) More than a reading group of women but a place for honest, respectful, intelligent conversations led by adult women. Discussions a ...more
Ladies & Literature
— 1198 members
— last activity 8 hours, 45 min ago
Welcome Women Readers Near & Far! ...more
Non Fiction Book Club
— 5117 members
— last activity Jun 03, 2026 04:28PM
This group is for anyone who enjoys Non Fiction. Genres discussed here include Histories, Autobiographies, Biographies, Memoirs, Science and Technolog ...more
omniviolet’s 2025 Year in Books
Take a look at omniviolet’s Year in Books, including some fun facts about their reading.
omniviolet hasn't connected with their friends on Goodreads, yet.
Favorite Genres
Polls voted on by omniviolet
Lists liked by omniviolet






















