to-read
(1093)
currently-reading (11)
read (750)
did-not-finish (0)
read-in-part (51)
fiction (405)
nonfiction (366)
science (164)
history (162)
classics (154)
fantasy (122)
politics (102)
currently-reading (11)
read (750)
did-not-finish (0)
read-in-part (51)
fiction (405)
nonfiction (366)
science (164)
history (162)
classics (154)
fantasy (122)
politics (102)
literature-american
(99)
childrens-books (91)
philosophy (91)
science-fiction (88)
psychology (84)
america (77)
history-american (70)
historical-fiction (68)
reference (68)
school (64)
horror (62)
library (59)
childrens-books (91)
philosophy (91)
science-fiction (88)
psychology (84)
america (77)
history-american (70)
historical-fiction (68)
reference (68)
school (64)
horror (62)
library (59)
Evan O'Hara
is currently reading
bookshelves:
nonfiction,
history,
history-european,
war,
britain,
europe,
lecture-series,
military-history,
currently-reading
Reading for the 3rd time
read in May 2021
“Rodrigo Duterte was not the first politician in the world to declare war on a domestic issue. Wars on poverty, pornography, hunger, obesity, cancer, and drugs have been launched and fought by presidents and potentates long before Duterte moved into Malacañang Palace. None of these wars have so far been won. None of that matters, because for the politician, the declaration is a victory”
― Some People Need Killing
― Some People Need Killing
“A similar danger now confronts some critics of the identity trap. Its opponents are united by what they oppose, not by what they endorse. This creates a temptation to outsource their moral judgments to their opponents. Instead of militating for a positive vision of the future, these critics of the identity trap have started to rail against anything that somehow seems “woke.” In other words, they have become guilty of what, drawing on an idea by Emily Yoffe, I once called 180ism: “the tendency of many participants in public debate to hear what their perceived enemies have to say and immediately declare themselves diametrically opposed.”
― The Identity Trap: A Story of Ideas and Power in Our Time
― The Identity Trap: A Story of Ideas and Power in Our Time
“With Huawei’s design arm proving itself world-class, it wasn’t hard to imagine a future in which Chinese chip design firms were as important customers of TSMC as Silicon Valley giants. If the trends of the late 2010s were projected forward, by 2030 China’s chip industry might rival Silicon Valley for influence. This wouldn’t simply disrupt tech firms and trade flows. It would also reset the balance of military power.”
― Chip War: The Fight for the World's Most Critical Technology
― Chip War: The Fight for the World's Most Critical Technology
“The only other major competitor was Samsung, whose foundry business had technology that was roughly comparable to TSMC’s, though the company possessed far less production capacity. Complications arose, though, because part of Samsung’s operation involved building chips that it designed in-house. Whereas a company like TSMC builds chips for dozens of customers and focuses relentlessly on keeping them happy, Samsung had its own line of smartphones and other consumer electronics, so it was competing with many of its customers. Those firms worried that ideas shared with Samsung’s chip foundry might end up in other Samsung products. TSMC and GlobalFoundries had no such conflicts of interest.”
― Chip War: The Fight for the World's Most Critical Technology
― Chip War: The Fight for the World's Most Critical Technology
“In polite company in Washington and Silicon Valley, it was easier simply to repeat words like multilateralism, globalization, and innovation, concepts that were too vacuous to offend anyone in a position of power. The chip industry itself—deeply fearful of angering China or TSMC—put its considerable lobbying resources behind repeating false platitudes about how “global” the industry had become. These concepts fit naturally with the liberal internationalist ethos that guided officials of both political parties amid America’s unipolar moment. Meetings with foreign companies and governments were more pleasant when everyone pretended that cooperation was win-win. So Washington kept telling itself that the U.S. was running faster, blindly ignoring the deterioration in the U.S. position, the rise in China’s capabilities, and the staggering reliance on Taiwan and South Korea, which grew more conspicuous every year.”
― Chip War: The Fight for the World's Most Critical Technology
― Chip War: The Fight for the World's Most Critical Technology
Evan’s 2025 Year in Books
Take a look at Evan’s Year in Books, including some fun facts about their reading.
Favorite Genres
Polls voted on by Evan
Lists liked by Evan


















