77,896 books
—
290,572 voters
to-read
(1020)
currently-reading (43)
read (142)
did-not-finish (2)
non-fiction (72)
add-to-kindle (61)
2022-23 (13)
booker-2021 (13)
heart (13)
short-stories (12)
2026 (11)
gothic (11)
currently-reading (43)
read (142)
did-not-finish (2)
non-fiction (72)
add-to-kindle (61)
2022-23 (13)
booker-2021 (13)
heart (13)
short-stories (12)
2026 (11)
gothic (11)
power
(11)
2025 (8)
yanagihara-insp (8)
coffee-table-books (6)
design-books (6)
russian-novel (6)
italy (5)
law (5)
mickey (5)
phil (5)
buy (4)
english-novel (4)
2025 (8)
yanagihara-insp (8)
coffee-table-books (6)
design-books (6)
russian-novel (6)
italy (5)
law (5)
mickey (5)
phil (5)
buy (4)
english-novel (4)
“Thus women become more and more look-alike. But at the same time they are expected to express their individuality through their physical appearance. Thus they are kept coming and going, at one and the same time trying to express their similarity and their uniqueness. The demands of Sex Privatization contradict the demands of the Beauty Ideal, cause the severe feminine neurosis about personal appearance. [...] When women begin to look more and more alike, distinguished only by the degree to which they differ from a paper ideal, they can be more easily stereotyped as a class: they look alike, they think alike, and even worse, they are so stupid they believe they are not alike.”
― The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution
― The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution
“We have seen how women, biologically distinguished from men, are culturally distinguished from “human.” Nature produced the fundamental inequality — half the human race must bear and rear the children of all of them — which was later consolidated, institutionalized, in the interests of men. Reproduction of the species cost women dearly, not only emotionally, psychologically, culturally but even in strictly material (physical) terms: before recent methods of contraception, continuous childbirth led to constant “female trouble,” early aging, and death. Women were slaves class that maintained the species in order to free the other half for the business of the world — admittedly often its drudge aspects, but certainly all its creative aspects as well.”
― The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution
― The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution
“From cutting the throat of a young calf to cutting the throat of our brothers and sisters is but a step. While we are ourselves the living graves of murdered animals, how can we expect any ideal conditions of the earth!"
-Isadora Duncan”
― The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory
-Isadora Duncan”
― The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory
“But what about women who have contributed directly to culture? There aren't many. And in those cases where individual women have participated in male culture, they have had to do so on male terms. And it shows. Because they have had to compete as men, in a male game - while still be pressured to prove themselves in the old female roles, a role at odds with their self-appointed ambitions - it is not surprising that they are seldom as skilled as men at the game of culture.
Women have no means of coming to an understanding of what their experience is, or even that it is different from male experience. The tool for representing, for objectifying one's experience in order to deal with it, culture, is so saturated with male bias that women almost never have a chance to see themselves culturally through their own eyes. So that finally, signals from their direct experience that conflict with the prevailing (male) culture are denied and repressed.”
― The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution
Women have no means of coming to an understanding of what their experience is, or even that it is different from male experience. The tool for representing, for objectifying one's experience in order to deal with it, culture, is so saturated with male bias that women almost never have a chance to see themselves culturally through their own eyes. So that finally, signals from their direct experience that conflict with the prevailing (male) culture are denied and repressed.”
― The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution
“This natural division of labor was continued only at great cultural sacrifice: men and women developed only half of themselves, at the expense of the other half. The division of the psyche into male and female to better reinforce the reproductive division was tragic: the hypertrophy in men of rationalism, aggressive drive, the atrophy of their emotional sensitivity was a physical (war) as well as a cultural disaster. The emotionalism and passivity of women increased their suffering (we cannot speak of them in a symmetrical way, since they were victimized as a class by the division.) Sexually men and women were channeled into a highly ordered — time, place, procedure even dialogue — heterosexuality restricted to the genitals, rather than diffused over the entire physical being.”
― The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution
― The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution
The Mookse and the Gripes
— 2165 members
— last activity Apr 24, 2026 06:01PM
Forum for spirited and convivial discussion of fiction from around the world, with particular though not exclusive focus on 20th and 21st century fict ...more
Jasmine’s 2025 Year in Books
Take a look at Jasmine’s Year in Books, including some fun facts about their reading.
Polls voted on by Jasmine
Lists liked by Jasmine































