Status Updates From Francesca Woodman

tumultuous, provisional

.. that grappling with the dialectical questions embodied in the work is ultimately what the work is about. In other words, the process is the answer.
…Her work is always in dialogue with the past, most obviously through its palette.
…Woodman remarked, “A lot of photography is making records of people, as objects, as friends.” She preserved these exchanges, memorialized them, in her work. (JBlessing)

… Woodman’s work invites productive ambiguities along gendered lines. … Woodman elicits a range of possible responses, .. her images conjure ever-shifting associations of gendered, power, and pleasure. (Julia Bryan-Wilson essay)

Though the artists in this movement were motivated by widely disparate impulses, their work shared an emphasis on surface, design, and a renewed affirmation of visual pleasure. Not all adherents shared a feminist perspective; however, the movement in general tended to validate the work of female artists and traditionally feminine creative practices.

The work that she did in the last year of her life, however, could equally profitably be considered in relationship to another response to the cold masculinity of Minimalism: the less art historically fashionable Pattern and Decoration movement that took shape in the mid-197os, the aim of which was to eliminate the gap between the privileged realm of high art and the disparaged sphere of decoration.

[Most of her work is stained, creased, or annotated in her idiosyncratic handwriting. Many have messages, fragments of letters, postmarks on the reverse, as she frequently used them as stationery. Photos show her living with her pictures.. tacked to the walls, lined along the mantel, often heaped in great loose drifts on the floor.. Vintage prints seem to have lived a life of their own, more objects than images.]

neither mature woman nor [child] but in that tumultuous, provisional moment before true maturity. Her art is inward looking, experimental, and incomplete. Art historian Carol Armstrong [argued] for what she poetically calls "the beneficence of a certain kind of minorness" in Woodman's photography. Rather than diminishing the artist, [she] celebrates her work's peculiar qualities and appreciates it on its own terms

i feel like everyone knows i just adore this woman's work but something about it all compiled in a photobook really makes me excited

haunting photographs

"What happened is that I played piano for a long time. The pieces I played most were themes on variations. This occurs in my imagery."

I liked her technique with light but this book has so many exposed photos I wouldn't recommend anyone to buys it .. Actually I don't want to keep it ! Will be getting rid of it!!