Status Updates From Hegel's Logic: Being Part O...
Hegel's Logic: Being Part One of the Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences (1830) (Being Part One of the Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sic) 3rd edition by G. W. F. Hegel, John N. Findlay, William Wallace (1975) Paperback by
Status Updates Showing 1-30 of 317
Leo46
is on page 121 of 386
Really good guide as it was planned to be
— Nov 16, 2025 09:49AM
Add a comment
rylan
is on page 175 of 381
Very interesting stuff, especially when Hegel takes 'atomism' to task during his section on quantity. Now time for the 'Essence'...
— Jun 15, 2025 08:30PM
Add a comment
rylan
is on page 135 of 381
Marking this now before I get too far ahead and forget.
Not much to really say besides that, once I got past the introduction, a lot of things just clicked into place. Hard to really explain, you just gotta read it to get it.
— Jun 08, 2025 08:45PM
Add a comment
Not much to really say besides that, once I got past the introduction, a lot of things just clicked into place. Hard to really explain, you just gotta read it to get it.
rylan
is on page 45 of 381
The introduction alone is a bit of a doozy...I regret not finding a notebook in time for this. I suspect I will be revisiting the earlier portions of this book again and again, to seek more and more clarity.
That being said, something about this translation is just so entrancing I can't really put it out of mind. Exciting in that sense, can't wait to read more!
— May 27, 2025 08:45PM
Add a comment
That being said, something about this translation is just so entrancing I can't really put it out of mind. Exciting in that sense, can't wait to read more!
Mariam Trifess
is on page 26 of 381
I feel humbled. This is actually hard. I need chatgpt to explain each paragraph in plain language- go back to read it at least 5 times- take notes and read it again and then maybe I think I get it 🤡🫠. This will be a long read, but I’m determined to actually understand.
— May 09, 2025 08:11PM
Add a comment
Miles Tiller
is 50% done
Dazzling, intellectually overwhelming. But more manageable than PoS. Ive heard many times the fundamental question of metaphysics pitched as: why is there anything at all? I love that this book approaches the better framed question of: how does the absolute generate particulars? Why are there things? What is the productive differentiating force? Deleuze approaches this, Spinoza doesn’t and that’s why he’s ass.
— May 15, 2024 02:30PM
2 comments




















