Status Updates From Western Warfare in the Age ...
Western Warfare in the Age of the Crusades, 1000–1300 by
Status Updates Showing 1-30 of 49
Suzannah Rowntree
is on page 223 of 344
"[T]he savage treatment of defeated foot was a long-standing tradition of medieval warfare. War between elites, however, was marked by a degree of moderation and even mercy. Even in the Middle East, where a European Catholic elite confronted an Islamic nobility, a degree of contact and mutual appreciation was possible." You read that right: Crusaders were less likely to be bigots, than snobs.
— Jul 07, 2017 02:54AM
Add a comment
Suzannah Rowntree
is on page 219 of 344
"Those who summoned medieval armies could never be quite certain who would turn up or how suitable they would be for the task in hand, and this was particularly the case for crusades." - I'm really not convinced this was a bad thing, Mr France.
— Jul 06, 2017 02:31AM
Add a comment
Suzannah Rowntree
is on page 204 of 344
"[W]ar was about possession of land and rule over its people, and as few wished to rule deserts, they did not try to remove or slaughter the population." - why total war and genocide were both fairly unusual in the Middle Ages.
— Jul 05, 2017 01:01AM
Add a comment







