Status Updates From Missing the Revolution: Dar...

The comparative anthropology chapter was what all comparative anthropology is: meaningless rambling. Wholly unprincipled thinking guided by the politics of the authors which is exactly what human sociobiology was handed off to the leftists (social scientists).

The author of the behavioral ecology chapter ignored how Dickemann had to refute disinformation from anthropologists about infanticide. Why does anybody trust these people?

Segerstrale's chapter is genuinely strange. I don't know why anyone would say what she said here. Especially as an expert.

The flash of anger chapter is a bunch of prattle where nothing is said. Shocking.

What's come to be increasingly apparent to me in looking into the sociobiology/EP/SocCon triangle is that the EP are operating off a fake biology that kinda cauterized the rift between the natural sciences and the social sciences on this front. They're literally speaking a different language off an ersatz biology's grounding which was made to shift the work towards the antithesis pole of the dialectic.

I never really looked into Barkow. His social program looks perfectly compatible with Gould et al., yet he acts as if he isn't. Between that, him being a technocrat, and the spaceism, he's quite the character....

This book starts with a call to lower the gates for leftism. But, EP totally wasn't an op. How can people read the field and not see how it's an increasingly (de)limited hangout. Was always supposed to be.