Status Updates From Off-Topic: The Story of an ...

"They can't sell you if you won't behave," (p. 78).

It is entirely too easy for an unsuspecting reader to purchase a copy of Pride and Prejudice, incorrectly believing that it is part of the Twilight series.

lol

"Whoever owns the network
will run it as they see fit, normally to maximize their profit margin.
Members who dispute the rules will simply be thrown out. The
Terms of Use are written so as not to allow them any recourse."

"The Internet is transient. Information can be removed with a couple
of mouse-clicks; it is an Orwellian dream. We have been advised, by
people who claim to know about these things, that there is no point
in protesting against a social network."

Estas reseñasdebere buscrlas aqui y darles like

Nota preliminar: Debo saber si aun estándentro de GR

"When you can get rid of a piece of writting just by clicking on a few links, there's a temptation to believe that it's less serious. But it isn't. It's just less clear what you've done."

"Limiting readers' ability to discuss the cultural context of a book is censorship designed to promote author's interest"

"Goodreads has changed significantly [...] with their focus primarily on helping author sell books rather than being a place for readers, and the constant reminder that user content is only valuable as long as it doesn't conflict with their new bottom line, this place no longer feels like a 'bokish home.' "

We have written this book yo try and give a voice to the many people on Goodreads who strongly believe that the members of a social network are not a product, but community

I love how Good Reads are recommending a Horrible Histories book - since I'm reading this. How "off topic" can you get?