Status Updates From Right-Wing Women

She brings up a interesting point ‘Because women’s testimony is not and cannot be validated by the witness of men who have experiences the same events and given them the same value

Dworkin is saying that women face a unique epistemological problem (a problem about knowledge and evidence). Because men generally do not share those experiences, women's testimony cannot rely on male witnesses for confirmation.

It's worth noting that this is a rhetorical analogy about credibility and evidence, not an argument that the Holocaust and women's oppression are identical in scale or nature. Dworkin uses strong historical comparisons to make readers think about how societies decide whom to believe.

Holocaust survivors, despite initially facing disbelief in some cases, eventually came to be understood as credible because so many independent witnesses described remarkably similar experiences.
Women also tell strikingly similar stories, instead of treating this consistency as evidence that these harms are real and widespread, society often responds by doubting individual women.

Speaking about how there are so many testimonies about womens discrimination and still it is negated by those who claim to care about suffering. Dwonking compares the social response to women with the one given to holocaust survivors.

The death of Marilyn Monroe and how she wasn’t happy being the perfect woman and people couldn’t accept she wasn’t so they theorized she couldn’t have killed herself.
P10/11 - And then this last part in page 10, ‘should leave the heart seared, the mind in anguish, the conscience in upheaval’ i find it fascinating frase use.

how does one read any history of gender/sex relations and not become the joker