Status Updates From Falso allarme. Perché il ca...

He makes solids point utilizing (questionable?) evidence. Unfortunately, he almost negates his entire argument because I feel like every other page he claims the “big bad media” is trying to convince you Global Warming is going to kill you. This is a bit extreme and regularly takes away from his main argument.

This book is growing on me. I feel, however, that every other paragraph I find myself going “Hmm…I don’t know about the validity of that claim/argument, what source(s) is he citing?” I then go down an inquiry that may lead to a rabbit hole of Googling & research. This is not a bad thing, but I doubt most readers would take this approach and instead take the claim at face-value, which CAN be a VERY bad thing.

If the author did not shove down your throat the misleading statement of “The media shoves Global Warming gloom and doom down our throats” every few pages I could take this author’s contentions more seriously.