Status Updates From The Science of Interstellar
The Science of Interstellar by
Status Updates Showing 1-30 of 5,797
Iain Hawkes
is on page 138 of 336
...and the book doesn't go into much more depth. It certainly presents hypotheses as to how the blight could have been so destructive (and certainly generates a good comparison with the rise of cyanobacteria in Earth's distant past), but if anything, it feels like this material should have been in the film itself. Y'know, that North America's population by the film has apparently been reduced by 90%. 0_0
— 11 hours, 24 min ago
Add a comment
Iain Hawkes
is on page 138 of 336
While I consider myself reasonably well informed on astro-physics, I'll admit, a lot of the book's writing is too dense for me. That's not the book's fault, but at least for me, I think you need to be already well informed on the science to make heads or tails of it. I will say that I raised an eyebrow on the blight material. One of the (many) problems I had with Interstellar was how little the blight was explained,
— 11 hours, 25 min ago
Add a comment
Fred Lalonde
is 49% done
Brother, what the fuck is even quantum foam?
— 14 hours, 56 min ago
Add a comment














