Status Updates From Drikkegildet i Athen

I really like this book, but it can honestly be difficult to get through at times. And to be honest I don't really like Sokrates. Also why is this a book written about real people, but it is all made up by a guy with a clear bias. It is odd and a little annoying.

The Form of Beauty Itself (Auto to Kalon): Finally, at the top of the ladder, you catch a sudden vision of absolute, everlasting Beauty—pure, unmixed, unchanging, and divine.

For Plato, when you are captivated by a beautiful person, face, or work of art, you aren't just experiencing a random physical sensation. Your soul is recognizing a spark of something eternal.
"Love of what is beautiful" is the thread that pulls us out of our immediate, earthly existence and guides us toward wisdom, creativity, and the highest version of ourselves.

People whose souls are pregnant carry ideas, virtue, wisdom, art, and justice. When they encounter a beautiful soul, they give birth to "conceptions of the soul"—great works of literature, philosophy, laws, and moral guidance (like Homer).

Diotima explains that all human beings are "pregnant"—some in body, and some in soul.
Why Beauty Matters: We cannot give birth in the presence of ugliness; ugliness repulses us and makes us shrink back. Beauty acts as the midwife. When we encounter something or someone beautiful, it inspires us to release what we have been carrying inside and give birth.

When Socrates stumbles over the answer, Diotima simplifies it: if you replace the word "beauty" with "goodness," the answer becomes obvious. Loving what is good means wanting to possess the good forever so that you may be happy (eudaimon).
This leads directly into Diotima’s most famous revelation: how "love of what is beautiful" acts as an engine for human mortality striving toward immortality.

Up to this point, everyone agreed that Love seeks what is good and beautiful. But Diotima asks the crucial follow-up question that no one else thought to ask: Why? What does a person actually gain by possessing beautiful things?

“You can not desire what you don’t realize you lack.”

When you combine Agathon’s idealist view with Socrates’ philosophical view:
Agathon’s view: Love creates justice through harmony, gentleness, and mutual consent.
Socrates/Diotima’s view: Love drives the soul upward toward the "Form of the Good." For Plato, true Justice in a person’s soul—and in a society—can only happen when a person's desires are ordered toward this ultimate Good.

To be an "expert on love," then, is not to write beautiful poetry praising it as perfect and just. It is to recognize that love is a perpetual state of longing—a drive that pushes us from our state of lacking toward the eternal pursuit of Truth, Goodness, and Beauty.

Love is a "Medium" or "Daemon": Socrates reveals that his expertise doesn't come from his own intellect, but from a priestess named Diotima of Mantinea. She taught him that Love is an intermediate spirit (daemon) bridging the gap between what is mortal and what is divine, between ignorance and wisdom.

Love is NOT beautiful or good in itself (Refuting Agathon): Socrates cleverly cross-examines Agathon and gets him to admit a logical point: Desire is always desire for something you DO NOT have. If Eros desires beauty and goodness, it means Eros itself lacks beauty and goodness. Therefore, Love isn't a perfect, completely just god (like Agathon said), but a needy, searching force.

Socrates steps up and completely flips the room's understanding of what it means to be an "expert on love" (ta erotika). Throughout Plato’s dialogues, Socrates famously claims to "know nothing." But the Symposium contains a rare exception: Socrates frequently claimed that the only thing he ever understood or was an expert in was the art of love (ta erotika).

Eros is incapable of suffering injustice. Love never uses force nor is violence ever used against Love, because everyone willingly serves Love in all they do. Where there is consent, there is true Justice (Dikaiosyne). Because love inspires mutual consent, peace, and harmony rather than coercion, it is the purest expression of justice.
(It’s an idyllic claim: where true love exists, injustice becomes impossible!)

Plato balances this idyllic romanticism with realism. Just when the speeches reach their highest, Alcibiades stumbles in drunk at the end of the night. His unvarnished and painfully relatable outburst about his love for Socrates brings all those lofty romantic ideals crashing back down to the messy, complicated realities of actual human emotion—jealousy, unrequited desire, vulnerability, and heartbreak.

Diotima describes a bond where two people don't just love each other physically, but become co-creators of "conceptions of the soul"—sharing ideas, art, philosophy, and wisdom. It’s an idealized vision of romance grounded in deep intellectual communion and mutual inspiration.

In the earlier speeches by Phaedrus and Pausanias, love isn't just about feeling good—it makes you a better person. They paint an idyllic picture of lovers who inspire each other toward courage, honor, and virtue because neither wants to look cowardly or dishonorable in front of the person they adore. It’s the romantic ideal that true love elevates us and brings out our highest potential.

Aristophanes’ myth is the ultimate expression of romantic idealism: the idea that somewhere out there is your exact missing half, created for you before you were even fully human. The notion that falling in love isn't just an accident, but a profound reunion that restores your soul to wholeness, is about as romantic as literature gets. It transforms romantic desire into a sacred, destiny-driven longing.

“No pleasure is stronger than love.”

“Force can not touch Eros.”