Status Updates From Jesus Monotheism
Jesus Monotheism by
Status Updates Showing 1-30 of 32
Matthew Colvin
is on page 85 of 388
Totally misreads Bauckham and wrongly charges him with docetism. I am not impressed.
— Jun 27, 2019 08:55AM
Add a comment
Matthew Colvin
is on page 48 of 388
Add to this the fact that the author relies heavily on gematria, and I have a deepening skepticism that anything of lasting value will come from this book. So far, the author is on the side of Bauckham, Hurtado, and Wright, endorsing the “early high Christology” thesis that they have advanced.
— Jun 15, 2019 05:47AM
Add a comment
Matthew Colvin
is on page 47 of 388
It does not inspire confidence when the author makes elementary mistakes of Latin and Greek: “in the Greek of 1 Thess 3:11 the verb “direct” (kateuthynai) is a singular” (no, it is an infinitive, which does not have number) and ““there is the practice of writing the name of Jesus as a nomina sacra” (sic; nomen sacrum would be the singular).
— Jun 15, 2019 05:47AM
Add a comment
Ben
is on page 249 of 388
Arguments that SOME second-Temple Judaisms would allow incorporation of Greco-Roman treatments of "divine humans" in their cultivation practice, though those individuals had to be exemplary Israelites. Did ask great questions about the implications of this for Deuteronomistic theology, as well.
— Dec 11, 2016 09:56AM
Add a comment
Ben
is on page 205 of 388
This chapter argued that "The Similitudes of Enoch" was a pre-Christian text (along with other Enochic and Danielic texts) evincing Son of Man messianism. Not sure how to feel about the conclusion, but asked good questions.
— Dec 10, 2016 03:58PM
Add a comment
Ben
is on page 157 of 388
Most of the critiques of Hurtado's conception of the origins of Christ devotion hit squarely, and Fletcher-Louis's criticism is persuasive. But, at some points I didn't see that Fletcher-Louis's position was all that different from Hurtado's, despite his contention to the contrary.
— Dec 05, 2016 09:08PM
Add a comment
Ben
is on page 127 of 388
I'm impressed by Fletcher-Louis' level of engagement with the breadth and depth of evidence in Hurtado's and Bauckham's works. His critical engagement has convincingly shown to this point that Bauckham and Hurtado have done little to show that Christ devotion included understanding on the distinction between Jesus and God, and on the pre-existence/incarnation of Jesus.
— Nov 27, 2016 12:15PM
Add a comment
Ben
is on page 49 of 388
This "numerical criticism" but sounds like some illuminati mess. I'll need to read more about that before I'm convinced.
— Nov 26, 2016 12:52PM
Add a comment






