Status Updates From Kant's Prolegomena: To Any ...

This third and last part of the 'main transcendental question' is somehow even more obtuse than the previous part. The one diagram doesn't really help further elucidate anything for me. Perhaps a sign I should call it quits with regards to reading the CPR anytime soon?

:/

I understand some distinctions being made but I definitely feel more comfortable with part one than I do with two. It’s difficult to parse through on a first read, gonna have to listen to some lectures

The second part of the main transcendental question is perhaps the most mind-melting section of the book. While I could grasp a scant few concepts (namely how judgments of perception vs. of experience differ), this onslaught of paragraphs regarding 'pure natural science' and its various laws is frankly overwhelming.

No I’m completely lost now