Status Updates From The Case for Christ: A Jour...

Okay the second section is really weak. The first part of the book about the archeological aspects was rly interesting. But, the second section is rly poor in the way of rigorous apologetics. I’m not sure if Strobel ever consulted a mathematician when referencing Peter Stoner’s Science Speaks, but this is just rly bad stats. More akin to a Feynman estimation game in a world where Bayesian stats doesn’t exist.

Very interesting so far…a lot of content I had not seen or heard about before…