Status Updates From The Case for Christ

Okay the second section is really weak. The first part of the book about the archeological aspects was rly interesting. But, the second section is rly poor in the way of rigorous apologetics. I’m not sure if Strobel ever consulted a mathematician when referencing Peter Stoner’s Science Speaks, but this is just rly bad stats. More akin to a Feynman estimation game in a world where Bayesian stats doesn’t exist.

Very interesting so far…a lot of content I had not seen or heard about before…

So far it’s amazing the way Lee strobes uses his journalism background to make the reader feel as though he’s reading an exposé on Christianity that is backfiring and continually convincing himself and running into brick walls trying to trap and deceive. It’s a very enthralling read and very well written in my opinion