Status Updates From American Dialogue: The Foun...

This book is raising my blood pressure.

I want to DNF so bad but I am determined to see it through.

I liked the introduction. He explained that present contexts inform our understanding of the past, and that objectivity not possible for historians. The “best they can strive for is some measure of detachment” and to stigmatize “ideological prejudice.”
But then his book does the opposite. I would not care about the bias if he had owned that he’d do it. But his entire intro was about striving against bias!

This book has 352 pages, plus acknowledgements, notes, and the index.
I'm currently on page 120.