Status Updates From Sexual Consent (The MIT Pre...

pg 17 if the absence of “no” suggests capitulation to external power dynamics, then can an even seemingly enthusiastic “yes” can be the result of coercion? i am glad the author preemptively calls human sexuality as being “messy”.

pg 28 consummation as a legal requirement for recognizing marriage?!

pg 31 does not discuss what constitutes as rape in non-western countries...

My current big crit is that every once in a while there are entire pages blacked out with white text from the page before it, which the book originally made it seem like that format was only to be used for content warnings. Which feels confusing and slightly ill considered