Status Updates From The Ascent of Information: ...
The Ascent of Information: Books, Bits, Genes, Machines, and Life's Unending Algorithm by
Status Updates Showing 1-30 of 148
Mike Lisanke
is on page 61 of 352
Now the author goes NYTimes Best Book Whack-a-doodle liniot... jumps to the conclusion that we're running out of planet resources because of the blockchain... and the Dark Matter production continues with this book... must be a universal a-hole producing it? (or this author)
— Jan 13, 2025 10:19PM
Add a comment
Mike Lisanke
is on page 55 of 352
the Proof of work was Intended to make a required amount of work to Mine a bitcoin... it's not a problem to make sure any particular message is the same/equivalent... that's a secure hash... Scharf's explanation of the Blockchain is Idiotic.
— Jan 13, 2025 10:12PM
Add a comment
Mike Lisanke
is on page 55 of 352
Satochi didn't create the block chain to make the crypto secure... secure hashing was already secure... the author Caleb is a Moron.
— Jan 13, 2025 10:11PM
Add a comment
Mike Lisanke
is on page 52 of 352
the blockchain offers no greater backup to data... forget your key or coin (in wallet) and poof (it's gone)
— Jan 13, 2025 09:41PM
Add a comment
Mike Lisanke
is on page 51 of 352
cryptocurrency Proof of Work was inefficent by design.... that the author doesn't understand this... it just too stupid. I'd suggest writing books in the author's own field Butt we've seen how well that went. :rofl.
— Jan 13, 2025 09:39PM
Add a comment
Mike Lisanke
is on page 48 of 352
the author's a cosmology... maybe he only knows how to do arithmetic in orders of magnitude... seriously, when chips use few electrons (optics) to do computing... they Use Less Energy... and we keep making more efficient chips yearly. Author's an idiot.
— Jan 13, 2025 09:36PM
Add a comment
Mike Lisanke
is on page 46 of 352
author seems to know a lot about China computer data centers.... hothot is cool so the cooling cost is less... cute.
— Jan 13, 2025 09:34PM
Add a comment
Mike Lisanke
is starting
We have to seriously doubt the amount of work (materials) that went into a computer chip (of any complexity) is orders of magnitude more material/work than e.g. a car. We may need to Move a lot more material but the concept of filtration is a common one. And No, we wouldn't have metals (steel/aluminum) or plastics (hydrocarbons) without a lot of prework before use. So the author really has a burden of proof to argue!
— Jan 13, 2025 09:31PM
Add a comment









