Status Updates From O podstawie moralnosci

Finished Chapter 9: On the Ethical Difference of the Character
[comments on no free will and its consequences wrt morality and ethics]

Part Four: On the Meta Physical Explanation of the Primal Ethical Phenomenon
Chapter 1: How This Appendix must be Understood

Listening to this as an audiobook. Schopenhauer is writing an essay to the Royal Society on the basis of morality, and starts with a critique of Kant’s categorical imperative, his argument claiming that this ethical framework is based on theological principles and assumptions. This is compelling and Nietzsche’s claim that ethics are invented after a moral claim is asserted may ring true here.

when I arrive to a competition in biggest love-hate parasocial relationship and my opponent is Schopenhauer (he's talking abt Kant)

CHAPTER VIII. THE PROOF NOW GIVEN CONFIRMED BY EXPERIENCE.
about Compassion, animals

Starting:
CHAPTER IX. ON THE ETHICAL DIFFERENCE OF CHARACTER.
p. 175

CHAPTER VIII.
THE PROOF NOW GIVEN CONFIRMED BY EXPERIENCE.
p. 157

Nic nie rozumiem ale buja

Schopy argues that it's clear that Kant's famous leading principle isn't CATEGORICAL, but is in reality a HYPOTHETICAL Imperative.

Simple intuition - the Imperative tacitly assumes the condition that the law isn't just established for what I DO, but what is done TO ME as well; so I am not just active, but passive as well: 'eventualiter'.

I cannot possibly wish for injustice - very Rawlsian!